Literature DB >> 11720460

Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.

R F Brown1, P N Butow, S M Dunn, M H Tattersall.   

Abstract

Patient participation in medical consultations has been demonstrated to benefit their subsequent psychological well being. Question asking is one way in which patients can be active. We investigated 2 means of promoting cancer patient question asking. One was the provision of a question prompt sheet to patients prior to their initial consultation with their oncologist. The second was the active endorsement and systematic review of the question prompt sheet by their oncologist. 318 patients with heterogeneous cancers, seeing one of 5 medical and 4 radiation oncologists for the first time, were randomised to either receive or not receive a question prompt sheet. Doctors were randomised to either proactively address or passively respond to the question prompt sheet in the subsequent consultation. Anxiety was assessed prior to the consultation. Consultations were audiotaped and content analysed. Anxiety was assessed again immediately following the consultation. Within the next 10 days patients completed questionnaires assessing information needs, anxiety and satisfaction and were given a structured telephone interview assessing information recall. Patients provided with a question prompt sheet asked more questions about prognosis compared with controls and oncologists gave significantly more prognostic information to these patients. Provision of the question prompt sheet prolonged consultations and increased patient anxiety; however, when oncologists specifically addressed the prompt sheet, anxiety levels were significantly reduced, consultation duration was decreased and recall was significantly improved. A patient question prompt sheet, used proactively by the doctor, is a powerful addition to the oncology consultation. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720460      PMCID: PMC2375236          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  The construction of an objective test to measure patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J M Wriglesworth; J T Williams
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper.

Authors:  H Brody
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding.

Authors:  C K Smith; E Polis; R R Hadac
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.

Authors:  C A Barry; C P Bradley; N Britten; F A Stevenson; N Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

5.  Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients.

Authors:  C G Blanchard; M S Labrecque; J C Ruckdeschel; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

7.  Interaction exchange structure and patient satisfaction with medical interviews.

Authors:  W B Stiles; S M Putnam; M H Wolf; S A James
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking.

Authors:  R Brown; P N Butow; M J Boyer; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  97 in total

1.  Toward a greater understanding of breast cancer patients' decisions to discuss cancer-related internet information with their doctors: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Jamie S Ostroff; Alexandra Heerdt; Maura Dickler; Yuelin Li; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-19

2.  Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jae-Hyun Park; Eun-Jung Shim; Myung-Il Hahm; Jong-Hyock Park; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem.

Authors:  M Jefford; L Mileshkin; J Matthews; H Raunow; C O'Kane; T Cavicchiolo; H Brasier; M Anderson; J Reynolds
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahán; Katalin Varga; Rita Dudás; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sabine Fischbeck; Katja Petrowski; Mirjam Renovanz; Rebecca Nesbigall; Julian Haaf; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A rigorous evaluation of an institutionally-based communication skills program for post-graduate oncology trainees.

Authors:  Carma L Bylund; Smita C Banerjee; Philip A Bialer; Ruth Manna; Tomer T Levin; Patricia A Parker; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Abraham Bartell; Alexander Chou; Shira A Hichenberg; Maura Dickler; David W Kissane
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-06-01

7.  Improving youth question-asking and provider education during pediatric asthma visits.

Authors:  Betsy Sleath; Delesha M Carpenter; Scott A Davis; Claire Hayes Watson; Charles Lee; Ceila E Loughlin; Nacire Garcia; Daniel S Reuland; Gail Tudor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 8.  A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations.

Authors:  Philip W B Watson; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Susan T Vadaparampil; Susan Eggly; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

10.  Development of E-info gene(ca): a website providing computer-tailored information and question prompt prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Roel Otten; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.