Literature DB >> 16794850

[Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

H Gollwitzer1, P Diehl, L Gerdesmeyer, W Mittelmeier.   

Abstract

Reliable confirmation of periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty is a diagnostic challenge. The present work reviews published data evaluating the available diagnostic tools. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein serum levels are relatively sensitive methods with rather low specificity towards periprosthetic infection and are mainly applied to exclude infection. Studies evaluating scintigraphic methods--especially white cell scans--provide inconsistent data with varying accuracy. Consequently, white cell scans cannot be recommended as standard methods. Immunoscintigraphy with antigranulocyte antibodies and FDG-PET scans demonstrated promising results with particularly high sensitivities, but have to be validated in larger studies. Microbiological evaluation of joint aspirates proved high specificity for periprosthetic infection. However, an average of 20% of infected cases remained undetected. Nevertheless, aspiration is widely recommended for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism. Intraoperative frozen sections demonstrated excellent specificity with good sensitivity. The real accuracy of intraoperative culture and permanent histology cannot be determined due to the missing golden standard; however, a combination of both methods is recommended to define the final diagnosis. Large studies validating both methods and criteria for the final diagnosis of periprosthetic infection are necessary to optimize the diagnostic algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16794850     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0977-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  59 in total

1.  Efficacy of combined technetium-99m sulfur colloid/indium-111 leukocyte scans to detect infected total hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  T N Joseph; M Mujtaba; A L Chen; S L Maurer; J D Zuckerman; C Maldjian; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The value of white blood cell counts before revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Bohannon Mason; Thomas K Fehring; Susan M Odum; William L Griffin; Donna S Nussman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The reliability of diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasties.

Authors:  P Virolainen; H Lähteenmäki; A Hiltunen; E Sipola; O Meurman; O Nelimarkka
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.360

4.  Imaging of infected total arthroplasty with Tc-99m-labeled antigranulocyte antibody Fab'fragments.

Authors:  Thomas von Rothenburg; Martin Schoellhammer; Josef Schaffstein; Odo Koester; Gebhard Schmid
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J H Lonner; P Desai; P E Dicesare; G Steiner; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  G P Duff; P F Lachiewicz; S S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Prosthetic osteomyelitis with special reference to the knee: risks, treatment and costs.

Authors:  S Bengtson
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.709

8.  Improved method for detecting knee replacement infections based on extended combined 99mTc-white blood cell/bone imaging.

Authors:  M J Larikka; A K Ahonen; J A Junila; O Niemelä; M M Hämäläinen; H P Syrjälä
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.690

9.  White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection.

Authors:  P R Glithero; P Grigoris; L K Harding; S R Hesslewood; D J McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-05

10.  Differential bone-scanning in the evaluation of a painful total joint replacement.

Authors:  C M Reing; P F Richin; P I Kenmore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  26 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  M Lenz; G O Hofmann; T Mückley
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Synovial biomarkers for differential diagnosis of painful arthroplasty].

Authors:  I J Banke; N Stade; P M Prodinger; H M Mühlhofer; P Thomas; B Thomas; B Summer; M van Griensven; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty--causal analysis].

Authors:  H Graichen; M Strauch; T Katzhammer; L Zichner; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Optimal culture incubation time in orthopedic device-associated infections: a retrospective analysis of prolonged 14-day incubation.

Authors:  Nora Schwotzer; Peter Wahl; Dominique Fracheboud; Emanuel Gautier; Christian Chuard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.