Literature DB >> 8496202

White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection.

P R Glithero1, P Grigoris, L K Harding, S R Hesslewood, D J McMinn.   

Abstract

We report the results of imaging with labelled white cells in 52 patients before the revision of 54 cemented joint prostheses at which the diagnosis of infection was made from biopsies. Twenty-five hips were imaged with 111In-oxine-labelled cells; 20 hips and 11 knees were imaged with 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene-amineoxime-labelled cells. Of these, 13 hips and five knees proved to be infected. The scans taken together had an accuracy of 82%, a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 100%. Indium scans gave 37% sensitivity, 99mTc labelling 50% sensitivity. Infected arthroplasties with positive scans had presented significantly earlier than those with negative scans, the time after the original insertion being 1.1 years for the true-positive scans and 6.1 years for the false-negative scans. The value of labelled white-cell scans in the detection of infection in failed joint replacements is dependent on the activity of the infection. There is reduced sensitivity to the more insidious infections which affect arthroplasties and aspiration under controlled conditions remains an important investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496202     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Zanjing Zhai; Chuanlong Wu; Fangchun Jin; Haowei Li; Lei Wang; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Wengang Wang; Huiwu Li; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhenan Zhu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexander Gebhard; Martin Fuerst; Irina Berger; Peter Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Marco Brioschi; Pietro Randelli; Federico Ambrogi; Silvana Sdao; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection?

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Painful knee arthroplasty: current practice.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federica Rosso; Antonio Pastrone; Federico Dettoni; Roberto Rossi; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

8.  Dual-tracer approach vs. dual time-point approach in leukocyte scintigraphy in treatment evaluation of persistent chronic prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Johan Teiler; Börje Åkerlund; Harald Brismar; Irina Savitcheva; Marcus Ahl; Annie Bjäreback; Håkan Hedlund; Maria Holstensson; Rimma Axelsson
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.690

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.