Literature DB >> 16790416

Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations.

Markus Waibel1, Dario Floreano, Stéphane Magnenat, Laurent Keller.   

Abstract

The efficiency of social insect colonies critically depends on their ability to efficiently allocate workers to the various tasks which need to be performed. While numerous models have investigated the mechanisms allowing an efficient colony response to external changes in the environment and internal perturbations, little attention has been devoted to the genetic architecture underlying task specialization. We used artificial evolution to compare the performances of three simple genetic architectures underlying within-colony variation in response thresholds of workers to five tasks. In the 'deterministic mapping' system, the thresholds of individuals for each of the five tasks is strictly genetically determined. In the second genetic architecture ('probabilistic mapping'), the genes only influence the probability of engaging in one of the tasks. Finally, in the 'dynamic mapping' system, the propensity of workers to engage in one of the five tasks depends not only on their own genotype, but also on the behavioural phenotypes of other colony members. We found that the deterministic mapping system performed well only when colonies consisted of unrelated individuals and were not subjected to perturbations in task allocation. The probabilistic mapping system performed well for colonies of related and unrelated individuals when there were no perturbations. Finally, the dynamic mapping system performed well under all conditions and was much more efficient than the two other mapping systems when there were perturbations. Overall, our simulations reveal that the type of mapping between genotype and individual behaviour greatly influences the dynamics of task specialization and colony productivity. Our simulations also reveal complex interactions between the mode of mapping, level of within-colony relatedness and risk of colony perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16790416      PMCID: PMC1634781          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of division of labor in insect societies.

Authors:  G E Robinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Self-organization in social insects.

Authors:  E Bonabeau; G Theraulaz; J L Deneubourg; S Aron; S Camazine
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Genetic effects on task performance, but not on age polyethism, in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Major quantitative trait loci affecting honey bee foraging behavior.

Authors:  G J Hunt; R E Page; M K Fondrk; C J Dullum
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior.

Authors:  R E Page; M K Fondrk; G J Hunt; E Guzmán-Novoa; M A Humphries; K Nguyen; A S Greene
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior.

Authors:  O Rüppell; T Pankiw; R E Page
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Colony response to graded resource changes: an analytical model of the influence of genotype, environment, and dominance.

Authors:  Susan M Bertram; Root Gorelick; Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor.

Authors:  Z Y Huang; G E Robinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies.

Authors:  G E Robinson; R E Page; C Strambi; A Strambi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  18 in total

1.  Evolution of self-organized division of labor in a response threshold model.

Authors:  Ana Duarte; Ido Pen; Laurent Keller; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Selection methods regulate evolution of cooperation in digital evolution.

Authors:  Pawel Lichocki; Dario Floreano; Laurent Keller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Variance-based selection may explain general mating patterns in social insects.

Authors:  Olav Rueppell; Nels Johnson; Jan Rychtár
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Helene Muller
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009

6.  Fitness costs of worker specialization for ant societies.

Authors:  Evelien Jongepier; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The role of methylation of DNA in environmental adaptation.

Authors:  Kevin B Flores; Florian Wolschin; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Deciphering a methylome: what can we read into patterns of DNA methylation?

Authors:  Kevin B Flores; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.