Literature DB >> 15475393

Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior.

O Rüppell1, T Pankiw, R E Page.   

Abstract

The regulation of division of labor in social insects, particularly in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.), has received considerable attention from a number of biological subdisciplines, including quantitative and behavioral genetics, because of the high complexity of the behavioral traits involved. The foraging choices of honey bee workers can be accurately quantified, and previous studies have made the foraging behavior of honey bees one of the best studied naturally occurring behavioral phenotypes. Three quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been identified that influence a set of foraging variables, including the concentration of nectar collected and the amount of pollen and nectar brought back to the hive. This study extends previous genetic investigations and represents the most comprehensive investigation of the genetic architecture of these foraging variables. We examined the effects of markers for the three established QTL and for one further candidate gene (Amfor), in two reciprocal backcross populations. These populations were also used to carry out two new QTL mapping studies, with over 400 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers in each. We detected a variety of effects of the genetic markers for the established QTL and the candidate gene, which were mostly epistatic in nature. A few new QTL could be detected with a variety of mapping techniques. Our results add complexity to the genetic architecture of the foraging behavior of the honey bee. Specifically, we support the hypotheses that pln1, pln2, pln3, and Amfor are involved in the regulation of foraging behavior in the honey bee and add some new factors that deserve further study in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475393     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esh072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  41 in total

1.  Pleiotropy of segregating genetic variants that affect honey bee worker life expectancy.

Authors:  Luke R Dixon; Michelle R McQuage; Ellen J Lonon; Dominique Buehler; Oumar Seck; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.032

Review 2.  Genetic contributions to behavioural diversity at the gene-environment interface.

Authors:  Andres Bendesky; Cornelia I Bargmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits.

Authors:  Gro V Amdam; Angela Csondes; M Kim Fondrk; Robert E Page
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations.

Authors:  Markus Waibel; Dario Floreano; Stéphane Magnenat; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Genetic architecture of ovary size and asymmetry in European honeybee workers.

Authors:  O Rueppell; J D Metheny; T Linksvayer; M K Fondrk; R E Page; G V Amdam
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  How flies respond to honey bee pheromone: the role of the foraging gene on reproductive response to queen mandibular pheromone.

Authors:  Alison L Camiletti; David N Awde; Graham J Thompson
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-12-10

8.  Complex pleiotropy characterizes the pollen hoarding syndrome in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; M Kim Fondrk; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Heritable natural variation of light/dark preference in an outbred zebrafish population.

Authors:  Amelia Dahlén; Mahendra Wagle; Mahdi Zarei; Su Guo
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 1.250

10.  Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Thiago Mosqueiro; Colin S Brent; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.