Literature DB >> 18339809

Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies.

William O H Hughes1, Jacobus J Boomsma.   

Abstract

Social groups are vulnerable to cheating because the reproductive interests of group members are rarely identical. All cooperative systems are therefore predicted to involve a mix of cooperative and cheating genotypes, with the frequency of the latter being constrained by the suppressive abilities of the former. The most significant potential conflict in social insect colonies is over which individuals become reproductive queens rather than sterile workers. This reproductive division of labor is a defining characteristic of eusocial societies, but individual larvae will maximize their fitness by becoming queens whereas their nestmates will generally maximize fitness by forcing larvae to become workers. However, evolutionary constraints are thought to prevent cheating by removing genetic variation in caste propensity. Here, we show that one-fifth of leaf-cutting ant patrilines cheat their nestmates by biasing their larval development toward becoming queens rather than workers. Two distinct mechanisms appear to be involved, one most probably involving a general tendency to become a larger adult and the other relating specifically to the queen-worker developmental switch. Just as evolutionary theory predicts, these "royal" genotypes are rare both in the population and within individual colonies. The rarity of royal cheats is best explained as an evolutionary strategy to avoid suppression by cooperative genotypes, the efficiency of which is frequency-dependent. The results demonstrate that cheating can be widespread in even the most cooperative of societies and illustrate that identical principles govern social evolution in highly diverse systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18339809      PMCID: PMC2278208          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710262105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ant parasite queens revert to mating singly.

Authors:  Seirian Sumner; William O H Hughes; Jes S Pedersen; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Tragedy of the commons in Melipona bees.

Authors:  Tom Wenseleers; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Conflict resolution in insect societies.

Authors:  Francis L W Ratnieks; Kevin R Foster; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Enforced altruism in insect societies.

Authors:  Tom Wenseleers; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Frequency dependence and cooperation: theory and a test with bacteria.

Authors:  Adin Ross-Gillespie; Andy Gardner; Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Seirian Sumner; Steven Van Borm; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness.

Authors:  Heather R Mattila; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary causes and consequences of consistent individual variation in cooperative behaviour.

Authors:  Ralph Bergmüller; Roger Schürch; Ian M Hamilton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Kin-informative recognition cues in ants.

Authors:  Volker Nehring; Sophie E F Evison; Lorenzo A Santorelli; Patrizia d'Ettorre; William O H Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Who is the Queen's mother? Royal cheats in social insects.

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Cheater genotypes in the parthenogenetic ant Pristomyrmex punctatus.

Authors:  Shigeto Dobata; Tomonori Sasaki; Hideaki Mori; Eisuke Hasegawa; Masakazu Shimada; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Adaptation and the genetics of social behaviour.

Authors:  Laurent Keller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Intergenerational effect of juvenile hormone on offspring in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants.

Authors:  Sara Helms Cahan; Christopher J Graves; Colin S Brent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  The potential for gene flow in a dependent lineage system of a harvester ant: fair meiosis in the F1 generation.

Authors:  Meghan M Curry; Diana E Wheeler; Kimberly Yang; Kirk E Anderson
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  A parent-of-origin effect on honeybee worker ovary size.

Authors:  Benjamin P Oldroyd; Michael H Allsopp; Katherine M Roth; Emily J Remnant; Robert A Drewell; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Public goods dilemma in asexual ant societies.

Authors:  Shigeto Dobata; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.