Literature DB >> 16786550

Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry?

Trine Kjaer1, Mickael Bech, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Kristian Hart-Hansen.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyse the impact that attribute ordering has on the relative importance of the price attribute. A discrete choice experiment was performed in order to elicit psoriasis patients' preferences for treatment. We tested for ordering effect with respect to the price attribute, and disclosed noticeable higher price sensitivity when the price attribute was placed at the end of the program description. Our results indicate that preferences are context dependent and that heuristics may be used in the choice process. Our result does not, however, suggest that ordering effect is a symptom of lexicographic ordering. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786550     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  22 in total

1.  Age and choice in health insurance: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Karolin Becker; Peter Zweifel
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Ellen M Janssen; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia Boyd; John F P Bridges; Qian-Li Xue; Antonio C Wolff; Nancy L Schoenborn
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice.

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Frederik T Schut; Bas Donkers; Xander Koolman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-02-26

4.  Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joachim Marti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-26

5.  Benefit-Risk or Risk-Benefit Trade-Offs? Another Look at Attribute Ordering Effects in a Pilot Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Sebastian Heidenreich; Andrea Phillips-Beyer; Bruno Flamion; Melissa Ross; Jaein Seo; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?

Authors:  Brendan Mulhern; Richard Norman; Paula Lorgelly; Emily Lancsar; Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  A comparison of two experimental design approaches in applying conjoint analysis in patient-centered outcomes research: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Kinter; Thomas J Prior; Christopher I Carswell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Channeling consumers to preferred providers and the impact of status quo bias: does type of provider matter?

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Bas Donkers; Frederik T Schut
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.

Authors:  Brigitte A B Essers; Debby van Helvoort-Postulart; Martin H Prins; Martino Neumann; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Eliciting preferences to inform patient-centred policies: the case of psoriasis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Torbica; Giovanni Fattore; Fabio Ayala
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.