Literature DB >> 21706307

Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment.

Joachim Marti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of smoking cessation medications can considerably enhance the long-term abstinence rate at a reasonable cost, but only a small proportion of quitters seek medical assistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors that influence the decision to use such treatments and the willingness-to-pay of smokers for improved cessation drugs.
METHOD: A discrete choice experiment was conducted amongst smokers in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. Choice sets consisted of two hypothetical medications described via five attributes (price, efficacy, possibility of minor side effects, attenuation of weight gain and availability) and an opt-out option. Various discrete choice models were estimated to analyse both the factors that influence treatment choice and those that influence the overall propensity to use a smoking cessation medication.
RESULTS: Our results indicate that smokers are willing to pay for higher efficacy, less-frequent side effects and prevention of weight gain. Whether the drug is available over-the-counter or on medical prescription is of secondary importance. In addition, we show that there are several individual-specific factors influencing the decision to use such medications, including education level. Results also indicate substantial preference heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a potential demand for improved cessation medications. Broader usage could be reached through lower out-of-pocket price and greater efficacy. Secondary aspects such as side effects and weight gain should also be taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21706307     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0333-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  39 in total

1.  Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures.

Authors:  Arne Risa Hole
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapies for nicotine dependence in primary care settings: a multinational comparison.

Authors:  J Cornuz; A Gilbert; C Pinget; P McDonald; K Slama; E Salto; F Paccaud
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France.

Authors:  Célia Berchi; Jean-Marc Dupuis; Guy Launoy
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2006-06

5.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Hughes
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Cost-effectiveness of bupropion, nortriptyline, and psychological intervention in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Sharon M Hall; James M Lightwood; Gary L Humfleet; Alan Bostrom; Victor I Reus; Ricardo Muñoz
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Efficacy of varenicline, an alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs placebo or sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas E Jorenby; J Taylor Hays; Nancy A Rigotti; Salomon Azoulay; Eric J Watsky; Kathryn E Williams; Clare B Billing; Jason Gong; Karen R Reeves
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications.

Authors:  Tami L Mark; Joffre Swait
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Modelling non-demanders in choice experiments.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Diane Skåtun
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Kumanan Wilson; Popey Dimoulas; Edward J Mills
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Willingness to pay for quality of life technologies to enhance independent functioning among baby boomers and the elderly adults.

Authors:  Richard Schulz; Scott R Beach; Judith T Matthews; Karen Courtney; Annette Devito Dabbs; Laurel Person Mecca; Steadman Scott Sankey
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2013-03-25

3.  Assessing preferences for a university-based smoking cessation program in Lebanon: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Christine W Abbyad; Racquel E Kohler; Allison K Kratka; Leighanne Oh; Kathryn A Wood
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  A Cross-sectional Examination of What Smokers Perceive to be Important and Their Willingness to Pay for Tobacco Cessation Medications.

Authors:  Shanta R Dube; Michael F Pesko; Xin Xu
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Eliciting preferences for waterpipe tobacco smoking using a discrete choice experiment: implications for product regulation.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Wasim Maziak; David Hammond; Rima Nakkash; Farahnaz Islam; Xi Cheng; James F Thrasher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Application of Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kabindra Regmi; Dinesh Kaphle; Sabina Timilsina; Nik Annie Afiqah Tuha
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-03

8.  E-cigarette Product Preferences among Adult Smokers: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Ce Shang; Scott R Weaver; Justin S White; Jidong Huang; James Nonnemaker; Kai-Wen Cheng; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-01

9.  Methods Used in Smoking Cessation and Reduction Attempts: Findings from Help-Seeking Smokers.

Authors:  Marianne Lund; Elisabeth Kvaavik
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2021-03-09

10.  Smaller Cigarette Pack as a Commitment to Smoke Less? Insights from Behavioral Economics.

Authors:  Joachim Marti; Jody Sindelar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.