Literature DB >> 24446282

Eliciting preferences to inform patient-centred policies: the case of psoriasis.

Aleksandra Torbica1, Giovanni Fattore, Fabio Ayala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient preferences for psoriasis treatment features and to investigate the heterogeneity of preferences among patients with different socio-demographic and disease-related characteristics.
METHODOLOGY: A discrete choice experiment was conducted on adult patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis during a routine visit to their physician at 15 centres in Italy. We investigated the preferences of patients with respect to five treatment attributes: (1) mode and frequency of administration; (2) time to improvement; (3) time free of symptoms; (4) unintended life expectancy reduction resulting from treatment; and (5) monthly treatment cost. The heterogeneity of preferences was investigated in a mixed logit model with normally distributed random coefficients.
RESULTS: Overall, patients preferred the subcutaneous or intravenous route of administration (versus oral administration) and treatments that took less time to show improvement, ensured a longer time free of symptoms, involved a lesser reduction in life expectancy and had lower costs. There was significant preference heterogeneity for all attributes. The cost attribute was found to be significantly more important to females and to older patients (above 60 years of age). Older patients placed significantly greater emphasis on reduced life expectancy, whereas the time free of symptoms was significantly less important to them than to patients under 60 years of age. Patients with higher scores on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) placed higher value on the time free of symptoms than those with lower DLQI scores. For the overall sample, the marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for a month's reduction in the time to improvement was <euro>32.4, whereas the WTP for one additional month without symptoms was significantly higher (<euro>68.2).
CONCLUSION: Patient-centred policies should consider the heterogeneity of patients' expectations to identify individualized treatments that would aid in optimizing patient satisfaction and wellbeing, as well as overall treatment effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24446282     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0126-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  39 in total

1.  Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; David Meltzer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

4.  Therapeutic non-adherence: a rational behavior revealing patient preferences?

Authors:  Karine Lamiraud; Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Madeleine T King; Jane Hall; Emily Lancsar; Denzil Fiebig; Ishrat Hossain; Jordan Louviere; Helen K Reddel; Christine R Jenkins
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Objective assessment of compliance with psoriasis treatment.

Authors:  Sameh Said Zaghloul; Mark Jeremy David Goodfield
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2004-04

8.  Willingness to pay and time trade-off: sensitive to changes of quality of life in psoriasis patients?

Authors:  R Schiffner; J Schiffner-Rohe; M Gerstenhauer; F Hofstädter; M Landthaler; W Stolz
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 9.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology.

Authors:  Nasir Umar; David Litaker; Marthe-Lisa Schaarschmidt; Wiebke K Peitsch; Astrid Schmieder; Darcey D Terris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Patient Preference for Biologic Treatments of Psoriasis in the Chinese Setting.

Authors:  Yitian Lang; Bin Wu; Zhilin Sun; Erjia Ye; Guanshen Dou; Xin Guan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Patients With Psoriasis and Personalized Trade-offs in Treatment Decisions-Lessons Learned From Focus Groups.

Authors:  Jaehwan Kim; Dong Joo Kim; Francesca S Ortenzio; Lynn Dare; Christine Frank; Rhonda G Kost; Michelle A Lowes
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  Evaluating Risk Tolerance from a Systematic Review of Preferences: The Case of Patients with Psoriasis.

Authors:  Juan Marcos Gonzalez
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Adherence, satisfaction and preferences for treatment in patients with psoriasis in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I Belinchón; R Rivera; C Blanch; M Comellas; L Lizán
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Through 5 Years in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Long-Term Results from the UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 Phase-3 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Craig Leonardi; Kristian Reich; Peter Foley; Hideshi Torii; Sascha Gerdes; Lyn Guenther; Melinda Gooderham; Laura K Ferris; Christopher E M Griffiths; Hany ElMaraghy; Heidi Crane; Himanshu Patel; Russel Burge; Gaia Gallo; David Shrom; Ann Leung; Chen-Yen Lin; Kim Papp
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2020-03-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.