Literature DB >> 16777560

Simulation of mammographic lesions.

Robert Saunders1, Ehsan Samei, Jay Baker, David Delong.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: This study presents a method for generating breast masses and microcalcifications in mammography via simulation. This simulation method allows for the creation of large image datasets with particular lesions, which may serve as a useful tool for perception studies measuring imaging system performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study first characterized the radiographic appearance of both masses and microcalcifications, examining the following five properties: contrast, edge gradient profile of masses, edge characteristics of masses, shapes of individual microcalcifications, and shapes of microcalcification distributions. The characterization results then guided the development of routines that created simulated masses and microcalcifications. The quality of the simulations was verified by experienced breast imaging radiologists who evaluated simulated and real lesions and rated whether a given lesion had a realistic appearance.
RESULTS: The radiologists rated real and simulated lesions to have similarly realistic appearances. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis to characterize the degree of similarity, the results showed an A(z) of 0.68 +/- 0.07 for benign masses, 0.65 +/- 0.07 for malignant masses, and 0.62 +/- 0.07 for microcalcifications, thus showing notable overlap in the simulated and real lesion ratings.
CONCLUSION: This research introduced a new approach for simulating breast masses and microcalcifications that relied on anatomic characteristics measured from real lesions. Results from an observer performance experiment indicate that our simulation routine produced realistic simulations of masses and microcalcifications as judged by expert radiologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16777560     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  10 in total

1.  Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.

Authors:  Mark Ruschin; Pontus Timberg; Magnus Båth; Bengt Hemdal; Tony Svahn; Rob S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Ingvar Andersson; Soren Mattsson; Dev P Chakrabort; Anders Tingber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Dev Prasad Chakraborty; Chantal Van Ongeval; Jurgen Jacobs; Filip Claus; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computational insertion of microcalcification clusters on mammograms: reader differentiation from native clusters and computer-aided detection comparison.

Authors:  Zahra Ghanian; Aria Pezeshk; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-19

5.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Seamless Lesion Insertion for Data Augmentation in CAD Training.

Authors:  Aria Pezeshk; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Seamless Insertion of Pulmonary Nodules in Chest CT Images.

Authors:  Aria Pezeshk; Berkman Sahiner; Rongping Zeng; Adam Wunderlich; Weijie Chen; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses.

Authors:  Luis de Sisternes; Jovan G Brankov; Adam M Zysk; Robert A Schmidt; Robert M Nishikawa; Miles N Wernick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Lesion insertion in the projection domain: Methods and initial results.

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Zhicong Yu; Chi Ma; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.