Literature DB >> 16758107

Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.

Torsten Kluba1, Jürgen Schäfer, Tobias Hahnfeldt, Thomas Niemeyer.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: The purpose of the investigation was a comparison of two different digital X-ray techniques with conventional standing full spine films. Evaluation of dose area product, image quality and inter-observer error of Cobb-angle measurement in patients with scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis were studied.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 150 patients were prospectively randomized into three groups. Patients in group 1 (n=53) received a conventional standing postero-anterior full spine radiograph. All films were evaluated on the light box. Patients in group 2 (n=48) received a X-ray using the digital storage phosphor plate system (CR). For group 3 (n=49) digital pulsed fluoroscopy was used. In groups 2 and 3 images were exported to a picture archiving and communicating system (PACS) workstation and viewed on a monitor (Siemens SMM 21140P, Germany). Dose area product measurements were performed in all three groups (Diamentor-M, PTW, Freiburg). Three experienced investigators independently reviewed all pictures. Pedicles and endplates were counted. Cobb-angles of the main curves were measured.
RESULTS: The mean dose area product was 97.0 cGy cm(2) (37.0-380.0 cGy cm(2)) for conventional films, 31.5 cGy cm(2) (6.0-66.0 cGy cm(2)) for CR imaging and 5.0 cGy cm(2) (1.0-29.0 cGy cm(2)) for digital fluoroscopy. The differences of Cobb-angle measurements were not significantly different for the three methods. Differences in the count of pedicles and endplates between the investigators were significantly lower for the conventional film as an indicator for the best detail presentation.
CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in dose area product is possible with modern digital X-ray methods. The inter-observer error of Cobb-angle measurement is not significantly altered. The detail information is decreased in comparison to conventional films.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758107      PMCID: PMC3489424          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  8 in total

1.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.

Authors:  H Geijer; K Beckman; B Jonsson; T Andersson; J Persliden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Bert Verdonck; Karl-Wilhelm Beckman; Torbjörn Andersson; Jan Persliden
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Error analysis of scoliosis curvature measurement.

Authors:  C Gross; M Gross; S Kuschner
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst       Date:  1983

5.  Reduction of radiation dose in radiologic examination of patients with scoliosis.

Authors:  G Hellström; L Irstam; A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reducing the lifetime risk of cancer from spinal radiographs among people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A R Levy; M S Goldberg; N E Mayo; J A Hanley; B Poitras
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; J M Carlson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis.

Authors:  C L Nash; E C Gregg; R H Brown; K Pillai
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.284

  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of imaging in scoliosis.

Authors:  Geetika Khanna
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

Review 2.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Radiation dose reduction in plain radiography of the full-length lower extremity and full spine.

Authors:  Mi Ran Jeon; Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Kyung A Kang; Eun Young Kim; Hyun Pyo Hong; Inyoung Youn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Imaging of non-traumatic spinal diseases in children].

Authors:  G Pärtan; R Eyb; G Artacker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Assessment of the reliability of hand-held surface scanner in the evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yılmaz Yıldırım; Kadriye Tombak; Sezen Karaşin; İnci Yüksel; Ahmet Hakan Nur; Umut Ozsoy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Chimera of digital radiography in spine surgery: False diagnosis of implant failure.

Authors:  Khaled Hamed Salem; Andreas Ladenburger; Felix Schoth; Jörg Axel Ohnsorge
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-09-21

7.  Intervariability in radiographic parameters and general evaluation of a low-dose fluoroscopic technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Christian Wong; Jens Adriansen; Jytte Jeppsen; Andreas Balslev-Clausen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-09-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.