Literature DB >> 429405

Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis.

C L Nash, E C Gregg, R H Brown, K Pillai.   

Abstract

Thirteen healthy teenage girls with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis were studied using multiple thermoluminescent dosimeters while undergoing standard diagnostic roentgenograms. Average organ doses for each anteroposterior and lateral examination were calculated for bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, breast tissue, and gonads. Given an average of twenty-two roentgenograms over a three-year Milwaukee brace-treatment program, the increase in organ carcinogenic risk due to x-ray radiation ranged from 3.4 to fifteen per million (1.3 per cent to 7.5 per cent), except for breast tissue which increased from 140 to 290 per million (110 per cent). Using posteroanterior rather than anteroposterior exposures reduced the increased risk to 5.3 per million (3.8 per cent). The genetic risks of scoliosis roentgenographic studies were considered to be negligible, especially with gonadal shielding and infrequent roentgenograms made every three to four months. Good technique and judicious ordering of roentgenograms added significantly to the safety of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 429405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  31 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in scoliosis.

Authors:  N Wright
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.

Authors:  Torsten Kluba; Jürgen Schäfer; Tobias Hahnfeldt; Thomas Niemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L A Rinsky; J G Gamble
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-02

4.  Potential genetic markers predicting the outcome of brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Leilei Xu; Xusheng Qiu; Xu Sun; Saihu Mao; Zhen Liu; Jun Qiao; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Is there any use? Validity of 4D rasterstereography compared to EOS 3D X-ray imaging in patients with degenerative disk disease.

Authors:  L Wanke-Jellinek; O Heese; A Krenauer; C Würtinger; C J Siepe; K Wiechert; C Mehren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Parameter variation in stable scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; C Stengs; W Keessen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children.

Authors:  Jolanta Hansen; Anne Grethe Jurik; Bente Fiirgaard; Niels Egund
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-09-05

8.  The Isaacs cell sampler: an alternative to curettage.

Authors:  E Segadal; O E Iversen
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-02

Review 9.  Reducing the radiation dosage in patients with a scoliosis.

Authors:  J P Lescrève; R P Van Tiggelen; J Lamoureux
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jason M Frerich; Kristen Hertzler; Patrick Knott; Steven Mardjetko
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.