Literature DB >> 6317100

Error analysis of scoliosis curvature measurement.

C Gross, M Gross, S Kuschner.   

Abstract

The Cobb angle is the recommended standard for curvature assessment of scoliotic patients. Because the errors associated with this measure are thought to be significant, we conducted a study to quantify the variability of the Cobb measure among observers, within each observer's repeated measurements, and between the traditional protractor Cobb measurement and a computer-aided technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6317100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst        ISSN: 0883-9344


  10 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Cobb measurement by chiropractic interns using digital evaluation methods.

Authors:  Jesse Cracknell; Douglas M Lawson; John A Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.

Authors:  Torsten Kluba; Jürgen Schäfer; Tobias Hahnfeldt; Thomas Niemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.

Authors:  Ricarda Lechner; David Putzer; Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Taichi Tsuji; Patrick J Cahill; John M Flynn; John M Flynn; Michael Glotzbecker; Ron El-Hawary; John A Heflin; Shiro Imagama; Ajeya P Joshi; Ayato Nohara; Norman Ramirez; David P Roye; Toshiki Saito; Jeffrey R Sawyer; John T Smith; Noriaki Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-16

6.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.

Authors:  Michaela Gstoettner; Katrin Sekyra; Nadja Walochnik; Peter Winter; Roland Wachter; Christian M Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The Variability of Pelvic Obliquity Measurements in Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Alexa J Karkenny; Lacey C Magee; Matthew R Landrum; Jason B Anari; David Spiegel; Keith Baldwin
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 8.  A Survey of Methods and Technologies Used for Diagnosis of Scoliosis.

Authors:  Ilona Karpiel; Adam Ziębiński; Marek Kluszczyński; Daniel Feige
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Cobb Angle Reduction in a Nearly Skeletally Mature Adolescent (Risser 4) After Pattern-Specific Scoliosis Rehabilitation (PSSR).

Authors:  Marc Moramarco; Kathryn Moramarco; Maja Fadzan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-12-29

10.  3D Markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Maliheh Ghaneei; Amin Komeili; Yong Li; Eric C Parent; Samer Adeeb
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.