Literature DB >> 16730449

Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement.

Thomas Walther1, Ardawan Rastan, Volkmar Falk, Sven Lehmann, Jens Garbade, Anne K Funkat, Friedrich W Mohr, Jan F Gummert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and additional risk factors on outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: Four thousand one hundred and thirty-one patients who were operated between May 1996 and April 2004 were evaluated. One thousand eight hundred and fifty-six patients received bileaflet mechanical AVR and 2275 stented xenograft AVR. PPM was defined as severe if manufacturers effective orifice area (EOA) divided by body surface area (BSA) was <0.65 cm(2)/m(2) and as moderate in the range of 0.65-0.85 cm(2)/m(2). PPM, age, gender, EOA index, emergency indication for surgery (within 24h), EuroSCORE as well as requirement for additional procedures were tested. Univariate (Fisher's exact test) and multivariate logistic regression analysis as well as survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier) were performed.
RESULTS: Severe PPM was present in 97 (2.4%) and moderate PPM in 1103 (26.7%) patients. PPM occurs more frequently with xenograft AVR. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for severe, 10.6% for moderate and 6.9% with no PPM (p=0.018, OR 1.4). Moderate PPM was independently predictive for short- and long-term mortality. Further analysis revealed patient age >70 years (n=1589, p=0.002, OR 1.85), emergency indication (n=374, p<0.001, OR 4.4), EuroSCORE >10 (n=494, p<0.001, OR 4.7) and additional cardiac procedures (n=2049, p<0.001, OR 2.0) as predictors for adverse outcome after AVR.
CONCLUSION: Severe PPM is rare; moderate PPM is present in a quarter of patients. PPM has a significant impact on short- and long-term mortality after AVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16730449     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  30 in total

1.  Transcatheter resection of the native aortic valve prior to endovalve implantation - A rational approach to reduce TAVI-induced complications.

Authors:  Parla Astarci; Pierre-Yves Etienne; Benoit Raucent; Xavier Bollen; Kahn Tranduy; David Glineur; Laurent Dekerchove; Philippe Noirhomme; Gébrine Elkhoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Aortic valve prosthesis selection in dialysis patients based on the patient's condition.

Authors:  Shinya Fukui; Mitsuhiro Yamamura; Masataka Mitsuno; Hiroe Tanaka; Masaaki Ryomoto; Yuji Miyamoto
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation: Prediction from Preoperative Contractility Measurement.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Borer; Phyllis G Supino; Edmund McM Herrold; Antony Innasimuthu; Clare Hochreiter; Karl Krieger; Leonard N Girardi; O Wayne Isom
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 1.869

5.  Small prosthesis size in aortic valve replacement does not affect mortality.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Gorav Ailawadi; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; George Stukenborg; Ivan K Crosby; John A Kern; Irving L Kron
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Update on aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-13

7.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Cristina da Silva; Anders Sahlen; Reidar Winter; Magnus Bäck; Andreas Rück; Magnus Settergren; Aristomenis Manouras; Kambiz Shahgaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the elderly.

Authors:  Masaaki Ryomoto; Masataka Mitsuno; Mitsuhiro Yamamura; Hiroe Tanaka; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Shinya Fukui; Noriko Tsujiya; Tetsuya Kajiyama; Yuji Miyamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-08

Review 9.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

10.  Eight-year follow-up after prospectively randomized implantation of different mechanical aortic valves.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Thomas Walther; Sergey Leontyev; Jörg Kempfert; Ardawan Rastan; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.