Literature DB >> 25102782

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.

Cristina da Silva1, Anders Sahlen, Reidar Winter, Magnus Bäck, Andreas Rück, Magnus Settergren, Aristomenis Manouras, Kambiz Shahgaldi.   

Abstract

To investigate the role of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) and 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) in the determination of aortic annulus size prior transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its' impact on the prevalence of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Echocardiography plays an important role in measuring aortic annulus dimension in patients undergoing TAVI. This has great importance since it determines both eligibility for TAVI and selection of prosthesis type and size, and can be potentially important in preventing an inadequate ratio between the prosthetic valvular orifice and the patient's body surface area, concept known as prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). A total of 45 patients were studied pre-TAVI: 20 underwent 3D-TEE (men/women 12/8, age 84.8 ± 5.6) and 25 2D-TTE (men/women 9/16, age 84.4 ± 5.4) in order to measure aortic annulus diameter. The presence of PPM was assessed before hospital discharge and after a mean period of 3 months. Moderate PPM was defined as indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) ≤ 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) and severe PPM as AVAi < 0.65 cm(2)/m(2). Immediately post-TAVI, moderate PPM was present in 25 and 28 % of patients worked up using 3D-TEE and 2D-TTE respectively p value = n.s) and severe PPM occurred in 10 % of the patients who underwent 3D-TEE and in 20 % in those with 2D-TTE (p value = n.s). The echocardiographic evaluation 3 months post-TAVI showed 25 % moderate PPM in the 3D-TEE group compared with 24 % in the 2D-TTE group (p value = n.s) and no cases of severe PPM in the 3DTEE group comparing to 20 % in the 2D-TTE group (p = 0.032). Our results indicate a higher incidence of severe PPM in patients who performed 2DTTE compared to those performing 3DTEE prior TAVI. This suggests that the 3D technique should replace the 2DTTE analysis when investigating the aortic annulus diameter in patients undergoing TAVI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25102782     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0510-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  36 in total

1.  Impact of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Oliver Husser; Simon Rauch; Dierk H Endemann; Markus Resch; Julio Nunez; Vicente Bodi; Michael Hilker; Christof Schmid; Günter A J Riegger; Andreas Luchner; Christian Hengstenberg
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  Nicoló Piazza; Peter de Jaegere; Carl Schultz; Anton E Becker; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ertunc Altiok; Ralf Koos; Jörg Schröder; Kathrin Brehmer; Sandra Hamada; Michael Becker; Andreas H Mahnken; Mohammad Almalla; Guido Dohmen; Rüdiger Autschbach; Nikolaus Marx; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch and strategies to prevent it during aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Efstratios Apostolakis; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Nikolaos A Papakonstantinou; John Goudevenos
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

6.  Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Giordano Tasca; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Zen Mhagna; Giovanni Troise; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  D J O'Rourke; R T Palac; D J Malenka; C A Marrin; B E Arbuckle; J F Plehn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; John G Webb; Philippe Pibarot; Lukas Altwegg; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Robert De Larochellière; Daniel Doyle; Jean-Bernard Masson; Sebastien Bergeron; Olivier F Bertrand; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Hemodynamic assessment of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI: estimated myocardial supply-demand ratio and cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Polykarpos C Patsalis; Thomas F M Konorza; Fadi Al-Rashid; Björn Plicht; Heike A Hildebrandt; Daniel Wendt; Matthias Thielmann; Heinz G Jakob; Holger Eggebrecht; Gerd Heusch; Raimund Erbel; Philipp Kahlert
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch on postoperative early mortality in isolated aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Murat B Rabus; Kaan Kirali; Nihan Kayalar; Ilker Mataraci; Mehmet Yanartas; Nilgun Ulusoy-Bozbuga; Cevat Yakut
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2009-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Myocardial Mechanics After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Frédéric Poulin; Teerapat Yingchoncharoen; William M Wilson; Eric M Horlick; Philippe Généreux; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Mark D Osten; Anna Woo; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch - what cardiac anesthesiologists need to know?

Authors:  Kathirvel Subramaniam; Soheyla Nazarnia
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

3.  Incidence, Predictors and Outcome of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Biao Liao; Yi-Jian Li; Li Jun-Li; Zhen-Gang Zhao; Xin Wei; Jiay-Yu Tsauo; Tian-Yuan Xiong; Yuan-Ning Xu; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.