INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of large acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty represents a challenge to the surgeon and increases the complexity of the case. There are different options to overcome the problem of acetabular deficiency. In the elderly low demand patients, the main objective of revision surgery is to provide pain relief, allow immediate full weight bearing, and an early return to function. METHODS: This article presents our experience in acetabular revision surgery using a novel technique of two stage cementation and screw augmentation in low demand patients. We report on the surgical technique and present the early results in 10 patients. RESULTS: There were 6 females and 4 males with average age of 83.8 years. Patients were followed up for an average of 18.1 months. All patients were pain free and full weight bearing at the time of the final follow up with radiographs showing maintenance of implant position. None of the patients underwent revision surgery and there were no radiographic signs of failure detected in the early follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This is a suitable technique in the management of large acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty, especially in the low demand patient population. It is a simple cost-effective technique that reduces the complexity of the acetabular revision, operative time, and morbidity associated with prolonged complex revision surgery.
INTRODUCTION: The reconstruction of large acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty represents a challenge to the surgeon and increases the complexity of the case. There are different options to overcome the problem of acetabular deficiency. In the elderly low demand patients, the main objective of revision surgery is to provide pain relief, allow immediate full weight bearing, and an early return to function. METHODS: This article presents our experience in acetabular revision surgery using a novel technique of two stage cementation and screw augmentation in low demand patients. We report on the surgical technique and present the early results in 10 patients. RESULTS: There were 6 females and 4 males with average age of 83.8 years. Patients were followed up for an average of 18.1 months. All patients were pain free and full weight bearing at the time of the final follow up with radiographs showing maintenance of implant position. None of the patients underwent revision surgery and there were no radiographic signs of failure detected in the early follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This is a suitable technique in the management of large acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty, especially in the low demand patient population. It is a simple cost-effective technique that reduces the complexity of the acetabular revision, operative time, and morbidity associated with prolonged complex revision surgery.
Authors: Cathleen J O'Neill; Stephen B Creedon; Stephen A Brennan; Fiona J O'Mahony; Rosanne S Lynham; Shane Guerin; Rehan Gul; James A Harty Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 4.176