Literature DB >> 16718842

Evolution of surgical skills training.

Kurt-E Roberts1, Robert-L Bell, Andrew-J Duffy.   

Abstract

Surgical training is changing: one hundred years of tradition is being challenged by legal and ethical concerns for patient safety, work hours restrictions, the cost of operating room time, and complications. Surgical simulation and skills training offers an opportunity to teach and practice advanced skills outside of the operating room environment before attempting them on living patients. Simulation training can be as straight forward as using real instruments and video equipment to manipulate simulated "tissue" in a box trainer. More advanced, virtual reality simulators are now available and ready for widespread use. Early systems have demonstrated their effectiveness and discriminative ability. Newer systems enable the development of comprehensive curricula and full procedural simulations. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) has mandated the development of novel methods of training and evaluation. Surgical organizations are calling for methods to ensure the maintenance of skills, advance surgical training, and to credential surgeons as technically competent. Simulators in their current form have been demonstrated to improve the operating room performance of surgical residents. Development of standardized training curricula remains an urgent and important agenda, particularly for minimal invasive surgery. An innovative and progressive approach, borrowing experiences from the field of aviation, can provide the foundation for the next century of surgical training, ensuring the quality of the product. As the technology develops, the way we practice will continue to evolve, to the benefit of physicians and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16718842      PMCID: PMC4087965          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  49 in total

1.  Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; E Johnson; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system.

Authors:  S A Fraser; D R Klassen; L S Feldman; G A Ghitulescu; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models.

Authors:  Robert Sedlack; Bret Petersen; Kenneth Binmoeller; Joseph Kolars
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Effects of a moderate dose of alcohol on simulated laparoscopic surgical performance.

Authors:  A H Dorafshar; D J O'Boyle; R F McCloy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator reflects clinical experience in German surgeons.

Authors:  C Langelotz; M Kilian; C Paul; W Schwenk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Effect of sleep deprivation on the performance of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill.

Authors:  Brian J Eastridge; Elizabeth C Hamilton; Grant E O'Keefe; Robert V Rege; Rawson J Valentine; Daniel J Jones; Seifu Tesfay; Erwin R Thal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure.

Authors:  Donna Y Deng; Maxwell V Meng; Hiep T Nguyen; Gary C Bellman; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  45 in total

1.  Comparison of fresh-frozen cadaver and high-fidelity virtual reality simulator as methods of laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Mitesh Sharma; Alan Horgan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

3.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

4.  Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  S N Buzink; A D Koch; J Heemskerk; S M B I Botden; R H M Goossens; H de Ridder; E J Schoon; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Simulation in surgery: opportunity or threat?

Authors:  A G Gallagher; O Traynor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Acquisition of Competencies by Medical Students in Neurological Emergency Simulation Environments Using High Fidelity Patient Simulators.

Authors:  M J Sánchez-Ledesma; J A Juanes; C Sáncho; M Alonso-Sardón; J Gonçalves
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Vasile V Bintintan; Tobias Gehrig; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Do basic psychomotor skills transfer between different image-based procedures?

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Richard H M Goossens; Erik J Schoon; Huib de Ridder; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Current surgical training: simultaneous training in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Kano; Akihiko Takeshi; Hiroshi Kusanagi; Yu Watarai; Makio Mike; Shigetoshi Yamada; Osamu Mishima; Seiko Uwafuji; Michiko Kitagawa; Hiroyuki Watanabe; Seiichi Kitahama; Satoshi Matsuda; Satoshi Endo; David Gremillion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.