Literature DB >> 16709792

Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography.

Frederick S Pereles1, Jeremy D Collins, James C Carr, Chris Francois, Mark D Morasch, Richard M McCarthy, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Gordon M Butler, John P Finn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of hybrid peripheral magnetic resonance (MR) angiography by using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study protocol received approval from the Office of Sponsored Research at Northwestern University, which included review by the Office for the Protection of Research Subjects. Informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients (67 men: mean age, 66 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]; 54 women: mean age, 69 years +/- 14), who were referred for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease, underwent peripheral contrast material-enhanced MR angiography. By using a hybrid technique, two independent timing measurements were performed in the pelvis and calves followed by MR angiography of the calves and, subsequently, a pelvis-thigh stepping-table acquisition. Images were evaluated for extent of disease, on the basis of degree of stenosis; for venous contamination, on the basis of venous signal intensity; and for diagnostic quality, on the basis of diagnostic confidence of the observer. DSA correlation of the extent of vascular disease was available in 45 of these patients, which was used to evaluate the diagnostic power of the hybrid technique.
RESULTS: For detection of stenosis greater than 50%, the hybrid technique had 95% sensitivity (P < .05), 95% specificity (P < .05), and 95% accuracy (P < .05). There was no significant venous contamination in any of the examinations performed with this technique.
CONCLUSION: The hybrid peripheral MR angiography technique provides diagnostic-quality examinations and virtually eliminates venous contamination. RSNA, 2006

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16709792     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401041225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of meglumine gadoterate-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) compared with time-of-flight MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant non-coronary arterial disease: a pooled analysis of data from two clinical trials.

Authors:  D J Shah; T-H Lim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Unenhanced calf MR angiography at 3.0 T using electrocardiography-gated partial-fourier fast spin echo imaging with variable flip angle.

Authors:  Dan Li; Jiang Lin; Fuhua Yan; Qingyuan Wu; Weiwei Lv; Yan San; Hong Yun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using Gd-DOTA compared with time-of-flight MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant non-coronary arterial disease.

Authors:  Joon-Won Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Choong-Gon Choi; Gi-Young Ko; Jeong-Kon Kim; Tae-Won Kwon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography.

Authors:  Philip A Hodnett; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; Jeremy D Collins; John J Sheehan; Eugene E Dunkle; Navyash Gupta; James C Carr; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Time-resolved dual-station calf-foot three-dimensional bolus chase MR angiography with fluoroscopic tracking.

Authors:  Casey P Johnson; Eric A Borisch; James F Glockner; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Peripheral vasculature: high-temporal- and high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Clifton R Haider; James F Glockner; Anthony W Stanson; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA on a short, wide-bore 1.5-T system: intra-individual comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA.

Authors:  M Rasmus; J Bremerich; T Egelhof; R W Huegli; G Bongartz; D Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Steady state vascular imaging with extracellular gadobutrol: evaluation of the additional diagnostic benefit in patients who have undergone a peripheral magnetic resonance angiography protocol.

Authors:  Melissa M Ong; Katharina Hausotter; Lothar R Pilz; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.