Literature DB >> 21502384

Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography.

Philip A Hodnett1, Ioannis Koktzoglou, Amir H Davarpanah, Timothy G Scanlon, Jeremy D Collins, John J Sheehan, Eugene E Dunkle, Navyash Gupta, James C Carr, Robert R Edelman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, a nonenhanced two-dimensional electrocardiographically gated single-shot balanced steady-state free precession examination for the evaluation of symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, the institutional review board waived the requirement for informed patient consent. The QISS nonenhanced MR angiography technique was evaluated in a two-center trial involving 53 patients referred for lower extremity MR angiography for suspected or known chronic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with contrast material-enhanced MR angiography serving as the noninvasive reference standard. The accuracy of stenosis assessments performed with the nonenhanced MR angiography sequence was evaluated relative to the reference standard. Per-segment, per-region, and per-limb sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and assessments were considered correct only if they were in exact agreement with the reference standard-derived assessments. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling with use of an unstructured binomial logit analysis was used to account for clustering of multiple measurements per case. The sensitivity and specificity of QISS MR angiography for the determination of nonsignificant (<50%) versus significant (50%-100%) stenosis were compared with the sensitivity and specificity of the reference standard.
RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced MR angiography was found to be nearly equivalent to the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Non-GEE segment-based analysis revealed that for the two reviewers, nonenhanced MR angiography had sensitivities of 89.7% (436 of 486 segments) and 87.0% (423 of 486 segments) and specificities of 96.5% (994 of 1030 segments) and 94.6% (973 of 1028 segments).
CONCLUSION: QISS nonenhanced MR angiography offers an alternative to currently used imaging tests for symptomatic chronic lower limb ischemia, for which the administration of iodinated or gadolinium-based contrast agents is contraindicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502384      PMCID: PMC3121010          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo.

Authors:  M Miyazaki; S Sugiura; F Tateishi; H Wada; Y Kassai; H Abe
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era.

Authors:  J R Waugh; N Sacharias
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Emerging concepts in MR angiography. Preface.

Authors:  William J Weadock; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 5.  Assessment of aortic pathology and peripheral arterial disease using multidetector computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Peter H Lin; Carlos Bechara; Panagiotis Kougias; Tam T Huynh; Scott A LeMaire; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 1.089

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J Koelemay; J G Lijmer; J Stoker; D A Legemate; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: Technical considerations and clinical feasibility.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; John J Sheehan; Eugene Dunkle; Nancy Schindler; James Carr; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Thomas P Erlinger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Peripheral vascular disease: combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with x-ray angiography for treatment planning.

Authors:  Neil M Khilnani; Priscilla A Winchester; Martin R Prince; Erez Vidan; David W Trost; Harry L Bush; Richard Watts; Yi Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Imaging sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current role, evolving applications, and technical challenges.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Arterial flow characteristics in the presence of vascular disease and implications for fast spin echo-based noncontrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Pippa Storey; Ruth P Lim; Sooah Kim; David R Stoffel; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Tilman Schubert; Martin Takes; Markus Aschwanden; Markus Klarhoefer; Tanja Haas; Augustinus L Jacob; David Liu; Andreas Gutzeit; Sebastian Kos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Subtraction CT angiography for the diagnosis of iliac arterial steno-occlusive disease.

Authors:  Michiko Suzuki; Ryoichi Tanaka; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Akihiko Abiko; Shigeru Ehara
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf arteries at 3 Tesla: intraindividual comparison of 3D flow-dependent subtractive MRA and 2D flow-independent non-subtractive MRA.

Authors:  Gesine Knobloch; Marie-Teres Lauff; Sebastian Hirsch; Carsten Schwenke; Bernd Hamm; Moritz Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.

Authors:  Mustafa A Altaha; Jeffrey D Jaskolka; Kongteng Tan; Manuela Rick; Peter Schmitt; Ravi J Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Simultaneous static and cine nonenhanced MR angiography using radial sampling and highly constrained back projection reconstruction.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Charles A Mistretta; Shivraman Giri; Eugene E Dunkle; Parag Amin; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Peripheral limb vascular malformations: an update of appropriate imaging and treatment options of a challenging condition.

Authors:  H Madani; J Farrant; N Chhaya; I Anwar; H Marmery; A Platts; B Holloway
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Magalie Viallon; Victor Cuvinciuc; Benedicte Delattre; Laura Merlini; Isabelle Barnaure-Nachbar; Seema Toso-Patel; Minerva Becker; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Sven Haller
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.