Literature DB >> 20563321

Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening.

Simon J Craddock Lee1.   

Abstract

A core logic of cancer control and prevention, like much in public health, turns on the notion of decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Population-level data are increasingly used to develop risk profiles, or estimates, that clinicians and the consumer public may use to guide individual decisions about cancer screening. Individual risk perception forms a piece of a larger social economy of decision-making and choice that makes population screening possible. Individual decision-making depends on accessing and interpreting available clinical information, filtered through the lens of personal values and both cognitive and affective behavioral processes. That process is also mediated by changing social roles and interpersonal relationships. This paper begins to elucidate the influence of this "social context" within the complexity of cancer screening. Reflecting on current work in risk and health, I consider how ethnographic narrative methods can enrich this model.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20563321      PMCID: PMC2886592          DOI: 10.1080/13698571003637048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Risk Soc        ISSN: 1369-8575


  48 in total

1.  The concept of risk in biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors:  P H Van Ness
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Beyond perception: the experience of risk and stigma in community contexts.

Authors:  Robin S Gregory; Theresa A Satterfield
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  Odds and ends: risk, mortality, and the politics of contingency.

Authors:  Thomas M Malaby
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09

Review 4.  Precaution, prevention, and public health ethics.

Authors:  Douglas L Weed
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2004-06

Review 5.  Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Melanie C Green; Joseph N Cappella; Michael D Slater; Meg E Wise; Doug Storey; Eddie M Clark; Daniel J O'Keefe; Deborah O Erwin; Kathleen Holmes; Leslie J Hinyard; Thomas Houston; Sabra Woolley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007-06

6.  Overdiagnosis and mammography screening.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-09

7.  Capitalizing on opportunities to refine health behavior theories.

Authors:  Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10

Review 8.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  A G K Edwards; R Evans; J Dundon; S Haigh; K Hood; G J Elwyn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 9.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai; Yulia S Krivoshekova; Lynn Ryzewicz; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  The converged experience of risk and disease.

Authors:  Robert A Aronowitz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  10 in total

1.  Examining Intuitive Cancer Risk Perceptions in Haitian-Creole and Spanish-Speaking Populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny; Erica I Lubetkin
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.959

2.  Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya.

Authors:  Joelle I Rosser; Betty Njoroge; Megan J Huchko
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-03-30

3.  Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Marcel Ramos; Yuelin Li; Susan Holland; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

4.  Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond Baser; Neil D Weinstein; Yuelin Li; Louis Primavera; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  Health Risk Soc       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  How do women at increased, but unexplained, familial risk of breast cancer perceive and manage their risk? A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Belinda J McClaren; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 6.  The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Emily Ross; Gwen Jacques; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jennifer M Taber; Amy McQueen; Ashley J Housten; Jamie L Studts; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  A cluster-randomised, parallel group, controlled intervention study of genetic prostate cancer risk assessment and use of PSA tests in general practice--the ProCaRis study: study protocol.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Peter Vedsted; Adrian Edwards; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Flemming Bro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  S Michelle Driedger; Gary Annable; Melissa Brouwers; Donna Turner; Ryan Maier
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  The Relationship between Health Disparities, Psychosocial Functioning and Health Outcomes in Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Populations: Recommendations for Clinical Care.

Authors:  Evrosina I Isaac; Andrea R Meisman; Kirstin Drucker; Stephanie Violante; Kathryn L Behrhorst; Alfonso Floyd; Jennifer M Rohan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.