Literature DB >> 25917141

Multiple stages of learning in perceptual categorization: evidence and neurocomputational theory.

George Cantwell1, Matthew J Crossley2, F Gregory Ashby3.   

Abstract

Virtually all current theories of category learning assume that humans learn new categories by gradually forming associations directly between stimuli and responses. In information-integration category-learning tasks, this purported process is thought to depend on procedural learning implemented via dopamine-dependent cortical-striatal synaptic plasticity. This article proposes a new, neurobiologically detailed model of procedural category learning that, unlike previous models, does not assume associations are made directly from stimulus to response. Rather, the traditional stimulus-response (S-R) models are replaced with a two-stage learning process. Multiple streams of evidence (behavioral, as well as anatomical and fMRI) are used as inspiration for the new model, which synthesizes evidence of multiple distinct cortical-striatal loops into a neurocomputational theory. An experiment is reported to test a priori predictions of the new model that: (1) recovery from a full reversal should be easier than learning new categories equated for difficulty, and (2) reversal learning in procedural tasks is mediated within the striatum via dopamine-dependent synaptic plasticity. The results confirm the predictions of the new two-stage model and are incompatible with existing S-R models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Procedural learning; Striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917141      PMCID: PMC4624621          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0827-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  55 in total

1.  A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; John M Ennis; Brian J Spiering
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Dissociation between striatal regions while learning to categorize via feedback and via observation.

Authors:  Corinna M Cincotta; Carol A Seger
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.

Authors:  S T Grafton; E Hazeltine; R Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Cognitive functions and corticostriatal circuits: insights from Huntington's disease.

Authors:  A D Lawrence; B J Sahakian; T W Robbins
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Interactions within and between corticostriatal loops during component processes of category learning.

Authors:  Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Carol A Seger
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input.

Authors:  W Rall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Category label and response location shifts in category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Brian D Glass; Jeffrey B O'Brien; J Vincent Filoteo; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-27
View more
  10 in total

1.  Generalization in category learning: the roles of representational and decisional uncertainty.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Kurt Braunlich; Hillary S Wehe; Zhiya Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Quantitative modeling of category learning deficits in various patient populations.

Authors:  J Vincent Filoteo; W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  What is automatized during perceptual categorization?

Authors:  Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-05-24

4.  Trial-by-trial switching between procedural and declarative categorization systems.

Authors:  Matthew J Crossley; Jessica L Roeder; Sebastien Helie; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  Perceptual category learning and visual processing: An exercise in computational cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  George Cantwell; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2017-03-06

6.  A neural interpretation of exemplar theory.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; Luke Rosedahl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  A difficulty predictor for perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Categorical evidence, confidence, and urgency during probabilistic categorization.

Authors:  Kurt Braunlich; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.140

10.  Answering questions about consciousness by modeling perception as covert behavior.

Authors:  Gustav Markkula
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.