Literature DB >> 16676170

Visuomotor representation decay: influence on motor systems.

Tyler M Rolheiser1, Gordon Binsted, Kyle J Brownell.   

Abstract

The contribution of ventral stream information to the variability of movement has been the focus of much attention, and has provided numerous researchers with conflicting results. These results have been obtained through the use of discrete pointing movements, and as such, do not offer any explanation regarding how ventral stream information contributes to movement variability over time. The present study examined the contribution of ventral stream information to movement variability in three tasks: Hand-only movement, eye-only movement, and an eye-hand coordinated task. Participants performed a continuous reciprocal tapping task to two point-of-light targets for 10 s. The targets were visible for the first 5 s, at which point vision of the targets was removed. Movement variability was similar in all conditions for the initial 5-s interval. The no-vision condition (final 5 s) can be summarized as follows: ventral stream information contributed to an initial significant increase in variability across motor systems, though the different motor systems were able to preserve ventral information integrity differently. The results of these studies can be attributed to the behavioral and cortical networks that underlie the saccadic and manual motor systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16676170     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0453-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements.

Authors:  G Binsted; D Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming.

Authors:  G Binsted; R Chua; W Helsen; D Elliott
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  Vying for dominance: dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Douglas P Munoz; Jillian H Fecteau
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  On-line modification of saccadic eye movements by retinal signals.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Olivier Martin; Claude Prablanc; Denis Pélisson; Christian Urquizar; Michel Desmurget
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott; J Madalena
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-08

9.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Cortical frames of reference for eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Paul Van Donkelaar; Ji-Hang Lee; Anthony S Drew
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  7 in total

1.  Integration of target and hand position signals in the posterior parietal cortex: effects of workspace and hand vision.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

Authors:  C Ehresman; D Saucier; M Heath; G Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The time course of online trajectory corrections in memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Brian A Richardson; Anusha Ratneswaran; James Lyons; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy.

Authors:  Kosuke Numasawa; Takeshi Miyamoto; Tomohiro Kizuka; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.