Literature DB >> 11750678

Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming.

G Binsted1, R Chua, W Helsen, D Elliott.   

Abstract

In a number of studies, we have demonstrated that the spatial-temporal coupling of eye and hand movements is optimal for the pickup of visual information about the position of the hand and the target late in the hand's trajectory. Several experiments designed to examine temporal coupling have shown that the eyes arrive at the target area concurrently with the hand achieving peak acceleration. Between the time the hand reached peak velocity and the end of the movement, increased variability in the position of the shoulder and the elbow was accompanied by a decreased spatial variability in the hand. Presumably, this reduction in variability was due to the use of retinal and extra-retinal information about the relative positions of the eye, hand and target. However, the hand does not appear to be a slave to the eye. For example, we have been able to decouple eye movements and hand movements using Müller-Lyer configurations as targets. Predictable bias, found in primary and corrective saccadic eye movements, was not found for hand movements, if on-line visual information about the target was available during aiming. That is, the hand remained accurate even when the eye had a tendency to undershoot or overshoot the target position. However, biases of the hand were evident, at least in the initial portion of an aiming movement, when vision of the target was removed and vision of the hand remained. These findings accent the versatility of human motor control and have implications for current models of visual processing and limb control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11750678     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00068-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  28 in total

1.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Barbara Mair; Josef Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands.

Authors:  S Riek; J R Tresilian; M Mon-Williams; V L Coppard; R G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; John P Wann; Janice H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor representation decay: influence on motor systems.

Authors:  Tyler M Rolheiser; Gordon Binsted; Kyle J Brownell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The order of gaze shifts affects spatial and temporal aspects of discrete bimanual pointing movements.

Authors:  Masahiro Kokubu; Soichi Ando; Shingo Oda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

Authors:  C Ehresman; D Saucier; M Heath; G Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The relative timing between eye and hand in rapid sequential pointing is affected by time pressure, but not by advance knowledge.

Authors:  F J A Deconinck; V van Polanen; G J P Savelsbergh; S J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.