Literature DB >> 19230513

Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

J F Rickard1, S Body, Z Zhang, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

This experiment examined the relationship between reinforcer magnitude and quantitative measures of performance on progressive-ratio schedules. Fifteen rats were trained under a progressive-ratio schedule in seven phases of the experiment in which the volume of a 0.6-M sucrose solution reinforcer was varied within the range 6-300 microl. Overall response rates in successive ratios conformed to a bitonic equation derived from Killeen's (1994) Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement. The "specific activation" parameter, a, which is presumed to reflect the incentive value of the reinforcer, was a monotonically increasing function of reinforcer volume; the "response time" parameter, delta, which defines the minimum response time, increased as a function of reinforcer volume; the "currency" parameter, beta, which is presumed to reflect the coupling of responses to the reinforcer, declined as a function of volume. Running response rate (response rate calculated after exclusion of the postreinforcement pause) decayed monotonically as a function of ratio size; the index of curvature of this function increased as a function of reinforcer volume. Postreinforcement pause increased as a function of ratio size. Estimates of a derived from overall response rates and postreinforcement pauses showed a modest positive correlation across conditions and between animals. Implications of the results for the quantification of reinforcer value and for the use of progressive-ratio schedules in behavioral neuroscience are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19230513      PMCID: PMC2614819          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  39 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcer sweetness and the D2/D3 antagonist raclopride on progressive ratio operant performance.

Authors:  S. Cheeta; S. Brooks; P. Willner
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Steady-state performance on fixed-, mixed-, and random-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Withdrawal following repeated exposure to d-amphetamine decreases responding for a sucrose solution as measured by a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  A M Barr; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Neural basis of utility estimation.

Authors:  P Shizgal
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine.

Authors:  Z Zhang; J F Rickard; S Body; K Asgari; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions and time-constrained progressive ratio performance: effects of different ratio requirements.

Authors:  S Hamill; J T Trevitt; K L Nowend; B B Carlson; J D Salamone
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Effect of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on performance on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement: implications for inter-temporal choice.

Authors:  G Bezzina; S Body; T H C Cheung; C L Hampson; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; E Szabadi; C M Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; P R Killeen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on performance on a progressive ratio schedule.

Authors:  Lourdes Valencia-Torres; C M Bradshaw; Arturo Bouzas; Enrique Hong; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Evidence for motivational effects elicited by activation of GABA-A or dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell.

Authors:  David Wirtshafter; Thomas R Stratford
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Evidence that neuropsychological deficits following early life adversity may underlie vulnerability to depression.

Authors:  Sarah A Stuart; Justyna K Hinchcliffe; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Effects of SKF-83566 and haloperidol on performance on progressive ratio schedules maintained by sucrose and corn oil reinforcement: quantitative analysis using a new model derived from the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement (MPR).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Evidence for a role of 5-HT2C receptors in the motor aspects of performance, but not the efficacy of food reinforcers, in a progressive ratio schedule.

Authors:  G Bezzina; S Body; T H C Cheung; C L Hampson; C M Bradshaw; J C Glennon; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Essential values of cocaine and non-drug alternatives predict the choice between them.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Jung S Kim; Brendan J Tunstall; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  S da Costa Araújo; S Body; L Valencia Torres; C M Olarte Sanchez; V K Bak; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.