Literature DB >> 16649030

Daily spinal mechanical loading as a risk factor for acute non-specific low back pain: a case-control study using the 24-Hour Schedule.

Eric W P Bakker1, Arianne P Verhagen, Cees Lucas, Hans J C M F Koning, Rob J de Haan, Bart W Koes.   

Abstract

A case-control study was conducted to assess the daily loading of the spine as a risk factor for acute non-specific low back pain (acute LBP). Acute LBP is a benign, self-limiting disease, with a recovery rate of 80-90% within 6 weeks irrespective of the treatment type. Unfortunately, recurrence rates are high. Therefore, prevention of acute LBP could be beneficial. The 24-Hour Schedule (24HS) is a questionnaire developed to quantify physical spinal loading, which is regarded as a potential and modifiable risk factor for acute and recurrent low back pain. A total of 100 cases with acute LBP and 100 controls from a primary care setting were included. Cases and controls completed questionnaires regarding acute LBP status and potential risk factors. Trained examiners blinded to subjects' disease status (acute LBP or not) assessed spinal loading using the 24HS. The mean difference of 24HS sum-scores between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). After multivariate regression analysis, previous episode(s), the 24HS and the Nottingham Health Profile were associated with the presence of acute LBP. High 24HS scores, indicating longer and more intensive spinal loading in flexed position, are strongly associated with acute LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649030      PMCID: PMC2198897          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0111-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 3.  Smoking and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 41 journal articles reporting 47 epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  C Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Whole-body vibration and low back pain: a systematic, critical review of the epidemiological literature 1992-1999.

Authors:  S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Data from a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-02

Review 6.  Distribution of tissue loads in the low back during a variety of daily and rehabilitation tasks.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1997-10

7.  Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study.

Authors:  P R Croft; G J Macfarlane; A C Papageorgiou; E Thomas; A J Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-02

8.  Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain.

Authors:  M A Adams; A F Mannion; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Sudden and unexpected loading generates high forces on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A F Mannion; M A Adams; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Risk factors for low back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  M Heliövaara
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.709

View more
  9 in total

1.  High frequency of McKenzie's postural syndrome in young population of non-care seeking individuals.

Authors:  Stephen May; Gauri Nanche; Sampada Pingle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

2.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The effects of upper limb loading on spinal shrinkage during treadmill walking.

Authors:  H Watson; A Simpson; P E Riches
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Authors:  Saman Madinei; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Identification of novel nucleus pulposus markers: Interspecies variations and implications for cell-based therapiesfor intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  R Rodrigues-Pinto; S M Richardson; J A Hoyland
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Tissue loading created during spinal manipulation in comparison to loading created by passive spinal movements.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Gregory N Kawchuk; Albert H Vette; Peter Goldsmith; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Direct and Intervertebral DiscMediated Sensitization of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons by Hypoxia and Low pH.

Authors:  Junxuan Ma; Despina Stefanoska; Sibylle Grad; Mauro Alini; Marianna Peroglio
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

9.  Spinal mechanical load: a predictor of persistent low back pain? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eric W P Bakker; Arianne P Verhagen; Cees Lucas; Hans J C M F Koning; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.