Literature DB >> 9563990

Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study.

P R Croft1, G J Macfarlane, A C Papageorgiou, E Thomas, A J Silman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the claim that 90% of episodes of low back pain that present to general practice have resolved within one month.
DESIGN: Prospective study of all adults consulting in general practice because of low back pain over 12 months with follow up at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after consultation.
SETTING: Two general practices in south Manchester. 490 subjects (203 men, 287 women) aged 18-75 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients who have ceased to consult with low back pain after 3 months; proportion of patients who are free of pain and back related disability at 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Annual cumulative consultation rate among adults in the practices was 6.4%. Of the 463 patients who consulted with a new episode of low back pain, 275 (59%) had only a single consultation, and 150 (32%) had repeat consultations confined to the 3 months after initial consultation. However, of those interviewed at 3 and 12 months follow up, only 39/188 (21%) and 42/170 (25%) respectively had completely recovered in terms of pain and disability.
CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with the interpretation that 90% of patients with low back pain in primary care will have stopped consulting with symptoms within three months. However most will still be experiencing low back pain and related disability one year after consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9563990      PMCID: PMC28536          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  [Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache].

Authors:  T Kohlmann; H Raspe
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.113

Review 2.  1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Influence of previous pain experience on the episode incidence of low back pain: results from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

Authors:  A C Papageorgiou; P R Croft; E Thomas; S Ferry; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population. Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Survey.

Authors:  A C Papageorgiou; P R Croft; S Ferry; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Practice variations, treatment fads, rising disability. Do we need a new clinical research paradigm?

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Can general practitioners predict the outcome of episodes of back pain?

Authors:  M O Roland; D C Morrell; R W Morris
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-02-12

7.  Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.

Authors:  K Walsh; M Cruddas; D Coggon
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26
  8 in total
  136 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  P C Wing
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents.

Authors:  L Manchikanti; V Pampati; B Fellows; C E Bakhit
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

3.  Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain.

Authors:  Sylvie Richard; Clermont E Dionne; Arie Nouwen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

4.  Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gareth T Jones; Ruth E Johnson; Nicola J Wiles; Carol Chaddock; Richard G Potter; Chris Roberts; Deborah P M Symmons; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

6.  IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Ricky Mullis; Julie Young; Carol Doyle; Martyn Lewis; David Whitehurst; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  [Periradicular infiltration therapy : Clinical indications, technique and results].

Authors:  B Oder; S Thurnher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  The role of anger in psychosocial subgrouping for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Anne N Nisenzon; Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Laura D Wandner; Calia Torres; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  The enduring impact of what clinicians say to people with low back pain.

Authors:  Ben Darlow; Anthony Dowell; G David Baxter; Fiona Mathieson; Meredith Perry; Sarah Dean
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Potential triaging of referrals for lumbar spinal surgery consultation: a comparison of referral accuracy from pain specialists, findings from advanced imaging and a 3-item questionnaire.

Authors:  David Simon; Matt Coyle; Simon Dagenais; Joseph O'Neil; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.