C Leboeuf-Yde1. 1. Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark. fecy@ringamt.dk
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the epidemiologic literature on smoking and low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether smoking causes low back pain and whether cessation of smoking reduces the incidence and/or prevalence of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It seems to have become increasingly commonly accepted that smoking causes low back pain and that abstinence from smoking is an effective means for its prevention and treatment. Does the evidence in the epidemiologic literature support this concept? METHODS: Forty-one original research reports reporting 47 studies, published between 1974 and 1996, were systematically reviewed for strength of association, dose-response correlation, temporality, reduction of symptoms with smoke cessation, and consistency of findings. In addition, the presence of positive findings was viewed in light of definition of low back pain, representativeness of the study sample, sample size, and in relation to whether the prime objective had been to study the smoking-low back pain issue. Two reviews were performed by the author, blindly and separated by a 2-month interval. RESULTS: There was no consistency of statistically significant positive associations between smoking and low back pain. The association, when present, was usually weak and clearly apparent only in large study samples. No other study characteristics had an effect on the frequency of positive associations. Additional analyses were therefore performed only on studies with large samples. In general, these did not contain consistent positive findings in relation to dose-response, temporality, or reversibility. Signs of causality were consistently evident only in the study with the largest sample (n > 30,000). CONCLUSIONS: Presently, smoking should be considered a weak risk indicator and not a cause of low back pain.
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the epidemiologic literature on smoking and low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether smoking causes low back pain and whether cessation of smoking reduces the incidence and/or prevalence of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It seems to have become increasingly commonly accepted that smoking causes low back pain and that abstinence from smoking is an effective means for its prevention and treatment. Does the evidence in the epidemiologic literature support this concept? METHODS: Forty-one original research reports reporting 47 studies, published between 1974 and 1996, were systematically reviewed for strength of association, dose-response correlation, temporality, reduction of symptoms with smoke cessation, and consistency of findings. In addition, the presence of positive findings was viewed in light of definition of low back pain, representativeness of the study sample, sample size, and in relation to whether the prime objective had been to study the smoking-low back pain issue. Two reviews were performed by the author, blindly and separated by a 2-month interval. RESULTS: There was no consistency of statistically significant positive associations between smoking and low back pain. The association, when present, was usually weak and clearly apparent only in large study samples. No other study characteristics had an effect on the frequency of positive associations. Additional analyses were therefore performed only on studies with large samples. In general, these did not contain consistent positive findings in relation to dose-response, temporality, or reversibility. Signs of causality were consistently evident only in the study with the largest sample (n > 30,000). CONCLUSIONS: Presently, smoking should be considered a weak risk indicator and not a cause of low back pain.
Authors: Eric W P Bakker; Arianne P Verhagen; Cees Lucas; Hans J C M F Koning; Rob J de Haan; Bart W Koes Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-04-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Marina Unrod; Ronald J Gironda; Michael E Clark; Kristi E White; Vani N Simmons; Steven K Sutton; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Pain Med Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 3.750