Literature DB >> 10751296

Sudden and unexpected loading generates high forces on the lumbar spine.

A F Mannion1, M A Adams, P Dolan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of spinal loading in healthy volunteers.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the bending and compressive forces acting on the lumbar spine, in a range of postures, when unknown loads are delivered unexpectedly to the hands. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidemiologic studies suggest that sudden and unexpected loading events often lead to back injuries. Such incidents have been shown to increase back muscle activity, but their effects on the compressive force and bending moment acting on the spine have not been fully quantified. Furthermore, previous investigations have focused on the upright posture only.
METHODS: In this study, 12 volunteers each stood on a force plate while weights of 0, 2, 4, and 6 kg (for men, 40% less for women) were delivered into their hands in one of three ways: 1) by the volunteer holding an empty box with handles, into which an unknown weight was dropped; 2) by the same way as in 1, but with volunteer wearing a blindfold and earphones to eliminate sensory cues; or 3) by the volunteer sliding a box of unknown weight off a smooth table. Experiments were carried out with participants standing in upright, partially flexed, and moderately flexed postures. Spinal compression resulting from muscular activity was quantified using electromyographic signals recorded from the back and abdominal muscles. The axial inertial force acting up the long axis of the spine was calculated from the vertical ground reaction force. The bending moment acting on the osteoligamentous spine was quantified by comparing measurements of lumbar curvature with the bending stiffness properties of cadaveric lumbar spines.
RESULTS: The contribution from abdominal muscle contraction to overall spinal compression was small (average, 8%), as was the axial inertial force (average, 2.5%), and both were highest in the upright posture. Peak bending moments were higher in flexed postures, but did not increase much at the moment of load delivery in any posture. Peak spinal compressive forces were increased by 30% to 70% when loads were suddenly and unexpectedly dropped into the box, and by 20% to 30% when they were slid off the table, as compared with loads simply held statically in the same posture (P < 0.001). The removal of audiovisual cues had little effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Sudden and alarming events associated with manual handling cause a reflex overreaction of the back muscles, which substantially increases spine compressive loading. Manual handling regulations should aim to prevent such events and limit the weight of objects to be lifted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751296     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations.

Authors:  T Bull Andersen; M Essendrop; B Schibye
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Daily spinal mechanical loading as a risk factor for acute non-specific low back pain: a case-control study using the 24-Hour Schedule.

Authors:  Eric W P Bakker; Arianne P Verhagen; Cees Lucas; Hans J C M F Koning; Rob J de Haan; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part II: high rate or 'surprise' loading.

Authors:  Zhi Shan; Kelly R Wade; Meredith L Schollum; Peter A Robertson; Ashvin Thambyah; Neil D Broom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Micromechanics of the human vertebral body for forward flexion.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Shashank Nawathe; Aaron J Fields; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Angle-ply biomaterial scaffold for annulus fibrosus repair replicates native tissue mechanical properties, restores spinal kinematics, and supports cell viability.

Authors:  Ryan Borem; Allison Madeline; Joshua Walters; Henry Mayo; Sanjitpal Gill; Jeremy Mercuri
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; John D Wark; Nicola L Fazzalari; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Skeletal site-related variation in human trabecular bone transcriptome and signaling.

Authors:  Satya S Varanasi; Ole K Olstad; Daniel C Swan; Paul Sanderson; Vigdis T Gautvik; Sjur Reppe; Roger M Francis; Kaare M Gautvik; Harish K Datta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The challenge and advancement of annulus fibrosus tissue engineering.

Authors:  Li Jin; Adam L Shimmer; Xudong Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adaptation of muscles of the lumbar spine to sudden imbalance in patients with lower back pain caused by military training.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Jian-guo Shi; Hong Ye; Zhi-rong Liu; Long-bao Zheng; Zhi-ming Ni; Liang-quan Fan; Jian Wang; Zhen-hai Hou
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Digital tomosynthesis based digital volume correlation: A clinically viable noninvasive method for direct measurement of intravertebral displacements using images of the human spine under physiological load.

Authors:  Daniel Oravec; Michael J Flynn; Roger Zauel; Sudhaker Rao; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.