Literature DB >> 28965479

Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Saman Madinei1, Xiaopeng Ning1.   

Abstract

The performance of manual material handling tasks is one major cause of lower back injuries. In the current study, we investigated the influence of the weight configuration of hand loads on trunk muscle activities and the associated spinal stability. Thirteen volunteers each performed static weight-holding tasks using two different 9 kg weight bars (with medial and lateral weight configurations) at two levels of height (low and high) and one fixed horizontal distance (which resulted in constant spinal joint moment across conditions). Results of the current study demonstrated that holding the laterally distributed load significantly reduced activation levels of lumbar and abdominal muscles by 9-13% as compared with holding the medially distributed load. We believe such an effect is due to an elevated rotational moment of inertia when the weight of the load is laterally distributed. These findings suggest that during the design and assessment of manual material handling tasks, such as lifting and carrying, the weight configuration of the hand load should be considered. Practitioner summary: Elevated trunk muscle activities were found when holding a medially distributed load vs. a laterally distributed load (with an equivalent external moment to the spine), indicating a reduced spinal stability due to the reduced rotational moment of inertia. The configuration of the hand load should be considered when evaluating manual material handling tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trunk biomechanics; electromyography; manual material handling; spinal stability; weight configuration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28965479      PMCID: PMC5929471          DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1387675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  43 in total

1.  Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.

Authors:  K P Granata; W S Marras
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability.

Authors:  J Cholewicki; A P Simons; A Radebold
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry.

Authors:  R. Norman; R. Wells; P. Neumann; J. Frank; H. Shannon; M. Kerr
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 1. Method development.

Authors:  W S Marras; K G Davis
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting.

Authors:  Navid Arjmand; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Ning; Jie Zhou; Boyi Dai; Majid Jaridi
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Abdominal muscle activation increases lumbar spinal stability: analysis of contributions of different muscle groups.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Mack G Gardner-Morse; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; S L Rajulu; W G Allread; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Fatigue influences the dynamic stability of the torso.

Authors:  K P Granata; P Gottipati
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The changes of lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation response due to laterally slanted ground surfaces.

Authors:  Boyi Hu; Xiaopeng Ning; Ashish D Nimbarte
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  3 in total

1.  Statistical prediction of load carriage mode and magnitude from inertial sensor derived gait kinematics.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Effects of Vertical Lifting Distance on Upper-Body Muscle Fatigue.

Authors:  Nianli Fang; Chang Zhang; Jian Lv
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Measuring Effects of Two-Handed Side and Anterior Load Carriage on Thoracic-Pelvic Coordination Using Wearable Gyroscopes.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.