Literature DB >> 16648166

On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins.

Lucy R Forrest1, Christopher L Tang, Barry Honig.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the extent to which techniques for homology modeling that were developed for water-soluble proteins are appropriate for membrane proteins as well. To this end we present an assessment of current strategies for homology modeling of membrane proteins and introduce a benchmark data set of homologous membrane protein structures, called HOMEP. First, we use HOMEP to reveal the relationship between sequence identity and structural similarity in membrane proteins. This analysis indicates that homology modeling is at least as applicable to membrane proteins as it is to water-soluble proteins and that acceptable models (with C alpha-RMSD values to the native of 2 A or less in the transmembrane regions) may be obtained for template sequence identities of 30% or higher if an accurate alignment of the sequences is used. Second, we show that secondary-structure prediction algorithms that were developed for water-soluble proteins perform approximately as well for membrane proteins. Third, we provide a comparison of a set of commonly used sequence alignment algorithms as applied to membrane proteins. We find that high-accuracy alignments of membrane protein sequences can be obtained using state-of-the-art profile-to-profile methods that were developed for water-soluble proteins. Improvements are observed when weights derived from the secondary structure of the query and the template are used in the scoring of the alignment, a result which relies on the accuracy of the secondary-structure prediction of the query sequence. The most accurate alignments were obtained using template profiles constructed with the aid of structural alignments. In contrast, a simple sequence-to-sequence alignment algorithm, using a membrane protein-specific substitution matrix, shows no improvement in alignment accuracy. We suggest that profile-to-profile alignment methods should be adopted to maximize the accuracy of homology models of membrane proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648166      PMCID: PMC1483079          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  69 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs.

Authors:  J D Thompson; F Plewniak; O Poch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Do transmembrane protein superfolds exist?

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms.

Authors:  E Wallin; G von Heijne
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Estimation of structural similarity of membrane proteins by hydropathy profile alignment.

Authors:  J S Lolkema; D J Slotboom
Journal:  Mol Membr Biol       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Secondary structure induction in aqueous vs membrane-like environments.

Authors:  S E Blondelle; B Forood; R A Houghten; E Pérez-Payá
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1997-10-05       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Architecture of helix bundle membrane proteins: an analysis of cytochrome c oxidase from bovine mitochondria.

Authors:  E Wallin; T Tsukihara; S Yoshikawa; G von Heijne; A Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A measure of helical propensity for amino acids in membrane environments.

Authors:  S C Li; C M Deber
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1994-06

10.  Computational analysis of alpha-helical membrane protein structure: implications for the prediction of 3D structural models.

Authors:  Tina A Eyre; Linda Partridge; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 1.650

View more
  92 in total

1.  VITAL NMR: using chemical shift derived secondary structure information for a limited set of amino acids to assess homology model accuracy.

Authors:  Michael C Brothers; Anna E Nesbitt; Michael J Hallock; Sanjeewa G Rupasinghe; Ming Tang; Jason Harris; Jerome Baudry; Mary A Schuler; Chad M Rienstra
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Computational study of the Na+/H + antiporter from Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Assaf Ganoth; Raphael Alhadeff; Isaiah T Arkin
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Synthesis, in vitro binding studies and docking of long-chain arylpiperazine nitroquipazine analogues, as potential serotonin transporter inhibitors.

Authors:  Małgorzata Jarończyk; Karol Wołosewicz; Mari Gabrielsen; Gabriel Nowak; Irina Kufareva; Aleksander P Mazurek; Aina W Ravna; Ruben Abagyan; Andrzej J Bojarski; Ingebrigt Sylte; Zdzisław Chilmonczyk
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Toward understanding the mechanism of action of the yeast multidrug resistance transporter Pdr5p: a molecular modeling study.

Authors:  Robert M Rutledge; Lothar Esser; Jichun Ma; Di Xia
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis of the GABA(A) receptor binding site residues reveals a novel cation-pi interaction between GABA and beta 2Tyr97.

Authors:  Claire L Padgett; Ariele P Hanek; Henry A Lester; Dennis A Dougherty; Sarah C R Lummis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Comparison of human solute carriers.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Pär Matsson; James E Shima; Ursula Pieper; Sook Wah Yee; Libusha Kelly; Leonard Apeltsin; Robert M Stroud; Thomas E Ferrin; Kathleen M Giacomini; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices.

Authors:  Dieter Langosch; Isaiah T Arkin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Membrane protein native state discrimination by implicit membrane models.

Authors:  Olga Yuzlenko; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Identification of molecular hinge points mediating alternating access in the vesicular monoamine transporter VMAT2.

Authors:  Dana Yaffe; Sebastian Radestock; Yonatan Shuster; Lucy R Forrest; Shimon Schuldiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Model-guided mutagenesis drives functional studies of human NHA2, implicated in hypertension.

Authors:  Maya Schushan; Minghui Xiang; Pavel Bogomiakov; Etana Padan; Rajini Rao; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.