Literature DB >> 16648100

Proteomic analysis in cancer research: potential application in clinical use.

Jesús García-Foncillas1, Eva Bandrés, Ruth Zárate, Natalia Remírez.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of cancer proteomics is to adapt proteomic technologies for routine use in clinical laboratories for the purpose of diagnostic and prognostic classification of disease states, as well as in evaluating drug toxicity and efficacy. The novel technologies allows researchers to facilitate the comprehensive analyses of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes in health and disease. The information that is expected from such technologies may soon exert a dramatic change in cancer research and impact dramatically on the care of cancer patients. Analysis of tumor-specific proteomic profiles may also allow better understanding of tumor development and the identification of novel targets for cancer therapy. The localization of gene products, which is often difficult to deduce from the sequence, can be determined experimentally. Mechanisms, such as regulation of protein function by proteolysis, recycling, and isolation in cell compartments, affect gene products, not genes. Finally, protein-protein interactions and the molecular composition of cellular structures can be determined only at the protein level. The biological variability among patient samples as well as the great dynamic range of biomarker concentrations are currently the main challenges facing efforts to deduce diagnostic patterns that are unique to specific disease states. While several strategies exist to address this problem, we have tried to offer a wide perspective about the current possibilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648100     DOI: 10.1007/BF02664935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  80 in total

1.  A two-dimensional liquid-phase separation method coupled with mass spectrometry for proteomic studies of breast cancer and biomarker identification.

Authors:  Rick L Hamler; Kan Zhu; Nathan S Buchanan; Paweena Kreunin; Maureen T Kachman; Fred R Miller; David M Lubman
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Characterization of pepsinogen C as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer using a histo-proteomic approach.

Authors:  Christian Melle; Günther Ernst; Bettina Schimmel; Annett Bleul; Roland Kaufmann; Merten Hommann; Konrad K Richter; Wolfgang Daffner; Utz Settmacher; Uwe Claussen; Ferdinand von Eggeling
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Proteomic studies on low- and high-grade human brain astrocytomas.

Authors:  Federico Odreman; Marco Vindigni; Marlen Lujardo Gonzales; Benedetta Niccolini; Giovanni Candiano; Bruno Zanotti; Miran Skrap; Stefano Pizzolitto; Giorgio Stanta; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression.

Authors:  Sooryanarayana Varambally; Jianjun Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Daniel R Rhodes; Rohit Mehra; Scott A Tomlins; Rajal B Shah; Uma Chandran; Federico A Monzon; Michael J Becich; John T Wei; Kenneth J Pienta; Debashis Ghosh; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Proteomic-based discovery and characterization of glycosylated eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and COOH-terminal osteopontin fragments for ovarian cancer in urine.

Authors:  Bin Ye; Steven Skates; Samuel C Mok; Nora K Horick; Helene F Rosenberg; Allison Vitonis; Dale Edwards; Patrick Sluss; Won K Han; Ross S Berkowitz; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Changes in serum proteomic patterns by presurgical alpha-tocopherol and L-selenomethionine supplementation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeri Kim; Peiyu Sun; Ying-Wai Lam; Patricia Troncoso; Anita L Sabichi; Richard J Babaian; Louis L Pisters; Curtis A Pettaway; Christopher G Wood; Scott M Lippman; Timothy J McDonnell; Ronald Lieberman; Christopher Logothetis; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  SELDI-TOF-based serum proteomic pattern diagnostics for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Emanuel F Petricoin; Lance A Liotta
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  Proteomic analysis of proteins altered by dibenzoylmethane in human prostatic cancer LNCaP cells.

Authors:  Monica C Frazier; Kimberly M Jackson; Ewa Jankowska-Stephens; Mark G Anderson; Wayne B Harris
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Proteomic signature corresponding to alpha fetoprotein expression in liver cancer cells.

Authors:  Hideki Yokoo; Tadashi Kondo; Kazuyasu Fujii; Tesshi Yamada; Satoru Todo; Setsuo Hirohashi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Proteomic profiling of urinary proteins in renal cancer by surface enhanced laser desorption ionization and neural-network analysis: identification of key issues affecting potential clinical utility.

Authors:  Mark A Rogers; Paul Clarke; Jason Noble; Nicholas P Munro; Alan Paul; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Reconstructing the pipeline by introducing multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker verification: an NCI-CPTC initiative perspective.

Authors:  Henry Rodriguez; Robert Rivers; Christopher Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Tara Hiltke; Amir Rahbar; Emily Boja
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Restructuring proteomics through verification.

Authors:  Emily Boja; Robert Rivers; Christopher Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Tara Hiltke; Amir Rahbar; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 3.  The path to clinical proteomics research: integration of proteomics, genomics, clinical laboratory and regulatory science.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  Korean J Lab Med       Date:  2011-04

Review 4.  Moving forward in colorectal cancer research, what proteomics has to tell.

Authors:  Nerea Bitarte; Eva Bandrés; Ruth Zárate; Natalia Ramirez; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Clinical proteomics and OMICS clues useful in translational medicine research.

Authors:  Elena López; Luis Madero; Juan López-Pascual; Martin Latterich
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 6.  Challenges in the Isolation and Proteomic Analysis of Cancer Exosomes-Implications for Translational Research.

Authors:  Jadwiga Jablonska; Monika Pietrowska; Sonja Ludwig; Stephan Lang; Basant Kumar Thakur
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2019-05-15

7.  Relevant phosphoproteomic and mass spectrometry: approaches useful in clinical research.

Authors:  Elena López; Sarbelio Rodríguez Muñoz; Juan López Pascual; Luis Madero
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-29

Review 8.  Proteogenomic convergence for understanding cancer pathways and networks.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 9.  Analytical validation considerations of multiplex mass-spectrometry-based proteomic platforms for measuring protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Thomas E Fehniger; Mark S Baker; György Marko-Varga; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.466

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.