Literature DB >> 21474978

The path to clinical proteomics research: integration of proteomics, genomics, clinical laboratory and regulatory science.

Emily S Boja1, Henry Rodriguez.   

Abstract

Better biomarkers are urgently needed to cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. While the genomics community is making significant advances in understanding the molecular basis of disease, proteomics will delineate the functional units of a cell, proteins and their intricate interaction network and signaling pathways for the underlying disease. Great progress has been made to characterize thousands of proteins qualitatively and quantitatively in complex biological systems by utilizing multi-dimensional sample fractionation strategies, mass spectrometry and protein microarrays. Comparative/quantitative analysis of high-quality clinical biospecimen (e.g., tissue and biofluids) of human cancer proteome landscape has the potential to reveal protein/peptide biomarkers responsible for this disease by means of their altered levels of expression, post-translational modifications as well as different forms of protein variants. Despite technological advances in proteomics, major hurdles still exist in every step of the biomarker development pipeline. The National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer initiative (NCI-CPTC) has taken a critical step to close the gap between biomarker discovery and qualification by introducing a pre-clinical "verification" stage in the pipeline, partnering with clinical laboratory organizations to develop and implement common standards, and developing regulatory science documents with the US Food and Drug Administration to educate the proteomics community on analytical evaluation requirements for multiplex assays in order to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these tests for their intended use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21474978      PMCID: PMC3116002          DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.2.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Lab Med        ISSN: 1598-6535


  66 in total

Review 1.  Food and Drug Administration regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mansfield; Timothy J O'Leary; Steven I Gutman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Protein microarray signature of autoantibody biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen S Anderson; Sahar Sibani; Garrick Wallstrom; Ji Qiu; Eliseo A Mendoza; Jacob Raphael; Eugenie Hainsworth; Wagner R Montor; Jessica Wong; Jin G Park; Naa Lokko; Tanya Logvinenko; Niroshan Ramachandran; Andrew K Godwin; Jeffrey Marks; Paul Engstrom; Joshua Labaer
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Susan E Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; Steven J Skates; D R Mani; David M Bunk; Clifford H Spiegelman; Lisa J Zimmerman; Amy-Joan L Ham; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven C Hall; Simon Allen; Ronald K Blackman; Christoph H Borchers; Charles Buck; Helene L Cardasis; Michael P Cusack; Nathan G Dodder; Bradford W Gibson; Jason M Held; Tara Hiltke; Angela Jackson; Eric B Johansen; Christopher R Kinsinger; Jing Li; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Richard K Niles; Trenton C Pulsipher; David Ransohoff; Henry Rodriguez; Paul A Rudnick; Derek Smith; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan M Variyath; Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto; Asa Wahlander; Sofia Waldemarson; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; N Leigh Anderson; Susan J Fisher; Daniel C Liebler; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Paul Tempst; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  A glycomics approach to the discovery of potential cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Hyun Joo An; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Integration of proteomic-based tools for improved biomarkers of myocardial injury.

Authors:  Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr; Marc Sabatine
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  A network model of a cooperative genetic landscape in brain tumors.

Authors:  Markus Bredel; Denise M Scholtens; Griffith R Harsh; Claudia Bredel; James P Chandler; Jaclyn J Renfrow; Ajay K Yadav; Hannes Vogel; Adrienne C Scheck; Robert Tibshirani; Branimir I Sikic
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Multiplex immune serum biomarker profiling in sarcoidosis and systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  P Beirne; P Pantelidis; P Charles; A U Wells; D J Abraham; C P Denton; K I Welsh; P L Shah; R M du Bois; P Kelleher
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Furio Pacini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  A proteomic approach for plasma biomarker discovery with iTRAQ labelling and OFFGEL fractionation.

Authors:  Emilie Ernoult; Anthony Bourreau; Erick Gamelin; Catherine Guette
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-11-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Interlaboratory reproducibility of selective reaction monitoring assays using multiple upfront analyte enrichment strategies.

Authors:  Amol Prakash; Taha Rezai; Bryan Krastins; David Sarracino; Michael Athanas; Paul Russo; Hui Zhang; Yuan Tian; Yan Li; Vathany Kulasingam; Andrei Drabovich; Christopher R Smith; Ihor Batruch; Paul E Oran; Claudia Fredolini; Alessandra Luchini; Lance Liotta; Emanuel Petricoin; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Daniel W Chan; Randall Nelson; Mary F Lopez
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Plasmodium falciparum malaria: proteomic studies.

Authors:  Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista; Andréia Patrícia Gomes; Eduardo Gomes de Mendonça; Rodrigo Roger Vitorino; Sarah Fumian Milward de Azevedo; Rodrigo de Barros Freitas; Luiz Alberto Santana; Maria Goreti de Almeida Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2012-12

3.  Sequential in-office vitreous aspirates demonstrate vitreous matrix metalloproteinase 9 levels correlate with the amount of subretinal fluid in eyes with wet age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Stephanie M Ecker; Scott M Pfahler; Joshua C Hines; Ann S Lovelace; Bert M Glaser
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.367

4.  Cluster and Principal Component Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Tumor Proteome.

Authors:  Mehdi Pooladi; Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani; Mehrdad Hashemi; Saeed Hesami-Tackallou; Solmaz Khaghani-Razi-Abad; Afshin Moradi; Ali Reza Zali; Masoumeh Mousavi; Leila Firozi-Dalvand; Azadeh Rakhshan; Mona Zamanian Azodi
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

5.  Proteomic profiling of serum from patients with tuberculosis.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Song; Minje Han; Yang Seon Choi; Ki Soon Dan; Man Gil Yang; Junghan Song; Sung Sup Park; Jae Ho Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Changwon Kang; Yejin Lee; J Eugene Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Nasopharyngeal Protein Biomarkers of Acute Respiratory Virus Infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Burke; Ricardo Henao; Erik Soderblom; Ephraim L Tsalik; J Will Thompson; Micah T McClain; Marshall Nichols; Bradly P Nicholson; Timothy Veldman; Joseph E Lucas; M Arthur Moseley; Ronald B Turner; Robert Lambkin-Williams; Alfred O Hero; Christopher W Woods; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 8.  Analytical validation considerations of multiplex mass-spectrometry-based proteomic platforms for measuring protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Thomas E Fehniger; Mark S Baker; György Marko-Varga; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  ExSTA: External Standard Addition Method for Accurate High-Throughput Quantitation in Targeted Proteomics Experiments.

Authors:  Yassene Mohammed; Jingxi Pan; Suping Zhang; Jun Han; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.494

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.