Literature DB >> 16628458

In vitro investigation of the influence of tibial slope on quadriceps extension force after total knee arthroplasty.

Sven Ostermeier1, Christof Hurschler, Henning Windhagen, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of tibial base plate angulation on knee kinematics and kinetics during knee arthroplasty. The amount of quadriceps force required to extend the knee and the anteroposterior displacement of a mobile bearing insert as well as tibiofemoral position were measured during an in vitro simulation of an isokinetic knee extension cycle. Human knee specimens (n = 7, mean age 62, range 52-75 years, all male) were tested in a kinematic knee simulating machine after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a mobile bearing insert prosthesis (Interax), Stryker/Howmedica). During simulation, a hydraulic cylinder applied sufficient force to the quadriceps tendon to produce an extension moment of 31 N m about the knee. The quadriceps load was measured using a load cell attached to the quadriceps tendon, the anteroposterior displacement of the mobile bearing insert as well as the relative tibiofemoral position was measured using an ultrasound base motion analysis system (CMS 100, Zebris). Quadriceps load, insert and tibial displacement were first investigated with the tibial base plate implanted with a neutral tibial base plate orientation, and subsequently after 10 degrees posterior angulation. The quadriceps forces needed to produce a 31 N m knee extension moment after TKA with neutral slope reached levels as high as 1,391 N (SD 82 N). After applying a posterior slope of 10 degrees , maximum quadriceps force was measured to be up to 1,303 N (SD 34 N, P = 0.04). The mobile bearing insert was observed to move up to 0.1 mm (SD 4.2 mm) anteriorly relative to the tibial base plate with neutral tibial slope, and up to 1.0 mm (SD 4.5 mm, P = 0.47) with tibial slope. Femoral position relative to the tibia moved from a posterior position of 13.1 mm (SD 4.0 mm) anteriorly up to 0.5 mm (SD 6.3 mm), and from 16.0 mm (SD 6.4 mm, P = 0.67) to 9.5 mm (SD 9.9 mm, P = 0.33) with a 10 degrees tibial slope. Posterior slope of the tibial base plate resulted in a more physiologic insert movement with a more posterior position of the femur and reduced quadriceps force especially in knee flexion angles above 60 degrees compared to TKA with a neutral slope of the tibial base plate. Thus, the data suggest that the quadriceps lever arm was improved, which might have positive effect in mobilization of patients after TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16628458     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0078-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  16 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs.

Authors:  Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Carl Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-12

2.  The design of guide surfaces for fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing knee replacements.

Authors:  P S Walker; S Sathasivam
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -sacrificing mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties. An in vitro comparison of the New Jersey LCS meniscal bearing and rotating platform prostheses.

Authors:  P J Lewandowski; M J Askew; D F Lin; F W Hurst; A Melby
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; J O Galante; R W Fermier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty--dynamic in vitro study.

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman; S Ostermeier; K H Wenger; C J Wirth
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Dorr; J L Ochsner; J Gronley; J Perry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Quadriceps function after TKA--an in vitro study in a knee kinematic simulator.

Authors:  S Ostermeier; C Hurschler; C Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Biomechanics and gait analysis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1988-05

10.  Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty using isokinetic testing.

Authors:  A T Berman; S J Bosacco; C Israelite
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

1.  Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Thomas J Heyse; Nadine Kron; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Sae Kwang Kwon; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The influence of the tibial slope on intra-operative soft tissue balance in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Oka; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Kazunari Ishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty can reduce the risk of knee instability associated with posterior tibial slope.

Authors:  Masaru Hada; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Ken Okazaki; Takao Kaneko; Koji Murakami; Yuan Ma; Satoshi Hamai; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Different femorotibial contact points between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKAs do not show clinical impact.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patella position is not a determinant for anterior knee pain 10 years after balanced gap total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Albert H van Houten; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Morphometric study of gender difference in osteoarthritis posterior tibial slope using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Ji-Hoon Nam; Hyun-Seok Chung; Heoung-Jae Chun; Hyo-Jeoung Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Quadriceps force after TKA with femoral single radius.

Authors:  Sven Ostermeier; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-T Kang; Y-G Koh; J Son; O-R Kwon; J-S Lee; S K Kwon
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.