OBJECTIVES: The aims of our study were to compare contrast injection protocols with contrast media containing 300 and 400 mg iodine per milliliter for optimal contrast enhancement in cardiac multidector row computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate the correlation of test bolus curve parameters with the final contrast density of the main bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Sixty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were included in a prospective double-blind study. Patients were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 received 83 mL of a contrast medium (CM) containing 300 mg of iodine (Iomeron 300, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at a flow rate of 3.3 mL/s, whereas group 2 received 63 mL of the same agent containing 400 mg of iodine (Iomeron 400) at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/s. The test bolus volumes were 20 mL and 15 mL, respectively. Imaging was performed using a 16-slice CT system (16DCT; Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Contrast densities (Hounsfield Units [HU]) were determined in the cardiac chambers and in the main coronary arteries. The peak density and area under the curve of the test bolus were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: The mean contrast densities of the coronary arteries were 259.1 +/- 46.7 HU for group 1 and 251.6 +/- 51.0 HU, for group 2. No noteworthy differences between groups were noted for density measurements in the cardiac chambers or for the ratio of right-to-left ventricle density. Whereas a positive correlation was noted for both groups between the area under the curve of the test bolus and the mean density of the main bolus, a positive correlation between peak density of the test bolus and mean density of the main bolus was noted only for group 1. CONCLUSION: Equivalent homogenous enhancement of the ventricular cavities and coronary arteries to that obtained using a CM with standard iodine concentration (Iomeron 300) can be achieved with lower overall volumes of administered CM and reduced injection flow rates when a CM with high iodine concentration (Iomeron 400) is used.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aims of our study were to compare contrast injection protocols with contrast media containing 300 and 400 mg iodine per milliliter for optimal contrast enhancement in cardiac multidector row computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate the correlation of test bolus curve parameters with the final contrast density of the main bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were included in a prospective double-blind study. Patients were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 received 83 mL of a contrast medium (CM) containing 300 mg of iodine (Iomeron 300, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) at a flow rate of 3.3 mL/s, whereas group 2 received 63 mL of the same agent containing 400 mg of iodine (Iomeron 400) at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/s. The test bolus volumes were 20 mL and 15 mL, respectively. Imaging was performed using a 16-slice CT system (16DCT; Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Contrast densities (Hounsfield Units [HU]) were determined in the cardiac chambers and in the main coronary arteries. The peak density and area under the curve of the test bolus were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: The mean contrast densities of the coronary arteries were 259.1 +/- 46.7 HU for group 1 and 251.6 +/- 51.0 HU, for group 2. No noteworthy differences between groups were noted for density measurements in the cardiac chambers or for the ratio of right-to-left ventricle density. Whereas a positive correlation was noted for both groups between the area under the curve of the test bolus and the mean density of the main bolus, a positive correlation between peak density of the test bolus and mean density of the main bolus was noted only for group 1. CONCLUSION: Equivalent homogenous enhancement of the ventricular cavities and coronary arteries to that obtained using a CM with standard iodine concentration (Iomeron 300) can be achieved with lower overall volumes of administered CM and reduced injection flow rates when a CM with high iodine concentration (Iomeron 400) is used.
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Anselmo Alessandro Palumbo; Roberto Malagò; Ludovico La Grutta; W Bob Meiijboom; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Michele Fusaro; Luigi Vignali; Alberto Menozzi; Valerio Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Massimo Midiri; Miles A Kirchin; Nico R A Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-10-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Keil; C Plumhans; F F Behrendt; M Das; S Stanzel; G Mühlenbruch; P Seidensticker; C Knackstedt; A H Mahnken; R W Günther; J E Wildberger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Florian F Behrendt; Hubertus Pietsch; Gregor Jost; Martin A Sieber; Sebastian Keil; Cedric Plumhans; Peter Seidensticker; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Annemarieke Rutten; Matthijs F L Meijs; Alexander M de Vos; Peter R Seidensticker; Mathias Prokop Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 5.315