Literature DB >> 23143417

Challenges to protocol optimization due to unexpected variation of CT contrast dose amount and flow.

Tracy J Robinson1, Jeffrey D Robinson, Daniel S Hippe, Lee M Mitsumori.   

Abstract

High-quality computed tomography (CT) exams are critical to maximizing radiologist's interpretive ability. Exam quality in part depends on proper contrast administration. We examined injector data from consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT exams to analyze variation in contrast administration. Discrepancies between intended IV contrast dose and flow rate with the actual administered contrast dose and measured flow rate were common. In particular, delivered contrast dose discrepancies of at least 10% occurred in 13% of exams while discrepancies in flow rate of at least 10% occurred in 42% of exams. Injector logs are useful for assessing and tracking this type of variability which may confound contrast administration optimization and standardization efforts.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23143417      PMCID: PMC3649061          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9544-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT.

Authors:  J J Sandstede; A Tschammler; M Beer; C Vogelsang; G Wittenberg; D Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography: comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400 milligrams of iodine per milliliter.

Authors:  Carsten Rist; Konstantin Nikolaou; Miles A Kirchin; Roland van Gessel; Kyongtae Ty Bae; Franz von Ziegler; Andreas Knez; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Michael R Bruesewitz; James M Kofler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Christian Fink; Carsten Rist; Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT.

Authors:  Kyongtae Ty Bae; Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Reducing CT radiation dose: a community hospital's experience.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Jafari; Lonnie D Simmons
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Contrast-induced nephropathy: epidemiology and prevention.

Authors:  S M Bagshaw; B F Culleton
Journal:  Minerva Cardioangiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.347

9.  Optimization of scan delay for routine abdominal 64-slice CT with body weight-adapted application of contrast material.

Authors:  A Tschugunow; M Puesken; K U Juergens; F Beyer; B Buerke; H Seifarth; W Heindel; J Wessling
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-02-24

Review 10.  Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  James A Brink
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.