Literature DB >> 16616739

Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with a subretinal electrode.

Ralph J Jensen1, Joseph F Rizzo.   

Abstract

The ultimate success of a retinal prosthesis to create vision will likely depend upon developing a base of knowledge of how best to electrically stimulate the retina. Previously, we studied the responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to current pulses applied with an electrode placed on the epiretinal surface. In the present study, we examined the responses of rabbit RGCs to current pulses applied with a subretinal electrode. Single-unit extracellular recordings were made from OFF RGCs and ON RGCs in isolated retinas, which were stimulated with monophasic current pulses (0.1-50ms in duration), delivered through a 500-mum diameter electrode. All RGCs elicited one or more bursts of action potentials upon electrical stimulation of the retina. The timing of the bursts depended upon both the polarity of the electrical stimulus and the RGC type. With near-threshold current pulses, the response latencies of OFF RGCs to anodal stimulation were comparable to those of ON RGCs to cathodal stimulation, whereas the response latencies of OFF RGCs to cathodal stimulation were comparable to those of ON RGCs to anodal stimulation. Threshold currents for activation of RGCs decreased with increased pulse duration. For OFF RGCs, threshold currents for cathodal current pulses were, on average, 2-7.5 times higher (depending upon pulse duration) than the threshold currents for anodal current pulses. For ON RGCs, threshold currents for cathodal and anodal current pulses were, on average, nearly identical for all pulse durations and were equivalent to threshold currents of OFF RGCs to anodal stimulation. With respect to a subretinal prosthesis, our findings suggest the possibility that cathodal current pulses may bias activation of ON RGCs in blind patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16616739     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  31 in total

1.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Jim Loudin; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Bongsoo Suh; Keith Mathieson; Natasha Naik; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Donald K Eddington; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  SiC protective coating for photovoltaic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Xin Lei; Sheryl Kane; Stuart Cogan; Henri Lorach; Ludwig Galambos; Philip Huie; Keith Mathieson; Theodore Kamins; James Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Role of electrical activity in promoting neural repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Photovoltaic Restoration of Central Vision in Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Yannick Le Mer; Saddek Mohand-Said; Mahiul Muqit; Jose A Sahel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.