Literature DB >> 16615213

Sexual reproduction reshapes the genetic architecture of digital organisms.

Dusan Misevic1, Charles Ofria, Richard E Lenski.   

Abstract

Modularity and epistasis, as well as other aspects of genetic architecture, have emerged as central themes in evolutionary biology. Theory suggests that modularity promotes evolvability, and that aggravating (synergistic) epistasis among deleterious mutations facilitates the evolution of sex. Here, by contrast, we investigate the evolution of different genetic architectures using digital organisms, which are computer programs that self-replicate, mutate, compete and evolve. Specifically, we investigate how genetic architecture is shaped by reproductive mode. We allowed 200 populations of digital organisms to evolve for over 10 000 generations while reproducing either asexually or sexually. For 10 randomly chosen organisms from each population, we constructed and analysed all possible single mutants as well as one million mutants at each mutational distance from 2 to 10. The genomes of sexual organisms were more modular than asexual ones; sites encoding different functional traits had less overlap and sites encoding a particular trait were more tightly clustered. Net directional epistasis was alleviating (antagonistic) in both groups, although the overall strength of this epistasis was weaker in sexual than in asexual organisms. Our results show that sexual reproduction profoundly influences the evolution of the genetic architecture.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16615213      PMCID: PMC1560214          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  From molecular to modular cell biology.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; J J Hopfield; S Leibler; A W Murray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Ancient origin of the Hox gene cluster.

Authors:  D E Ferrier; P W Holland
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects.

Authors:  C O Wilke; C Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Varieties of modules: kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors.

Authors:  R G Winther
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2001-08-15

5.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest.

Authors:  C O Wilke; J L Wang; C Ofria; R E Lenski; C Adami
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection.

Authors:  W R Rice; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate.

Authors:  Csaba Pál; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks.

Authors:  E Ravasz; A L Somera; D A Mongru; Z N Oltvai; A L Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Compensatory mutations cause excess of antagonistic epistasis in RNA secondary structure folding.

Authors:  Claus O Wilke; Richard E Lenski; Christoph Adami
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution.

Authors:  Thomas Hindré; Carole Knibbe; Guillaume Beslon; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Selective pressures for accurate altruism targeting: evidence from digital evolution for difficult-to-test aspects of inclusive fitness theory.

Authors:  Jeff Clune; Heather J Goldsby; Charles Ofria; Robert T Pennock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.

Authors:  Thomas MacCarthy; Aviv Bergman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A quasispecies approach to the evolution of sexual replication in unicellular organisms.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum; José F Fontanari
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  A mixability theory for the role of sex in evolution.

Authors:  Adi Livnat; Christos Papadimitriou; Jonathan Dushoff; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexis Gros; Hervé Le Nagard; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Experiments on the role of deleterious mutations as stepping stones in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Arthur W Covert; Richard E Lenski; Claus O Wilke; Charles Ofria
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sex, mixability, and modularity.

Authors:  Adi Livnat; Christos Papadimitriou; Nicholas Pippenger; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of recombination on complex regulatory circuits.

Authors:  Olivier C Martin; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Neutral evolution of robustness in Drosophila microRNA precursors.

Authors:  Nicholas Price; Reed A Cartwright; Niv Sabath; Dan Graur; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.