Literature DB >> 17646644

Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.

Thomas MacCarthy1, Aviv Bergman.   

Abstract

The prevalence of sexual reproduction remains one of the most perplexing phenomena in evolutionary biology. The deterministic mutation hypothesis postulates that sexual reproduction will be advantageous under synergistic epistasis, a condition in which mutations cause a greater reduction in fitness when combined than would be expected from their individual effects. The inverse condition, antagonistic epistasis, correspondingly is predicted to favor asexual reproduction. To assess this hypothesis, we introduce a finite population evolutionary process that combines a recombination modifier formalism with a gene-regulatory network model. We demonstrate that when reproductive mode and epistasis are allowed to coevolve, asexual reproduction outcompetes sexual reproduction. In addition, no correlation is found between the level of synergistic epistasis and the fixation time of the asexual mode. However, a significant correlation is found between the level of antagonistic epistasis and asexual mode fixation time. This asymmetry can be explained by the greater reduction in fitness imposed by sexual reproduction as compared with asexual reproduction. Our findings present evidence and suggest plausible explanations that challenge both the deterministic mutation hypothesis and recent arguments asserting the importance of emergent synergistic epistasis in the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646644      PMCID: PMC1931480          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705455104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest.

Authors:  C O Wilke; J L Wang; C Ofria; R E Lenski; C Adami
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  More on selection for and against recombination.

Authors:  A Bergman; M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 3.  Interactome modeling.

Authors:  Marc Vidal
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Vivien Measday; Kristin Baetz; Julie Guzzo; Karen Yuen; Teresa Kwok; Bilal Sheikh; Huiming Ding; Ryo Ueta; Trinh Hoac; Benjamin Cheng; Isabelle Pot; Amy Tong; Yuko Yamaguchi-Iwai; Charles Boone; Phil Hieter; Brenda Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment.

Authors:  M W Feldman; F B Christiansen; L D Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The evolution of epistasis and the advantage of recombination in populations of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  R L Malmberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7.

Authors:  Lingchong You; John Yin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effects of recombination on complex regulatory circuits.

Authors:  Olivier C Martin; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Female mating preferences determine system-level evolution in a gene network model.

Authors:  Janna L Fierst
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.

Authors:  Alexander O B Whitlock; Kayla M Peck; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the classification of epistatic interactions.

Authors:  Hong Gao; Julie M Granka; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Modeling the evolution of complex genetic systems: the gene network family tree.

Authors:  Janna L Fierst; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.656

6.  Biological species is the only possible form of existence for higher organisms: the evolutionary meaning of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Victor P Shcherbakov
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 7.  Using evolutionary computations to understand the design and evolution of gene and cell regulatory networks.

Authors:  Alexander Spirov; David Holloway
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  A comparison of sexual and asexual replication strategies in a simplified model based on the yeast life cycle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 1.919

9.  Mixed infections and hybridisation in monogenean parasites.

Authors:  Bettina Schelkle; Patricia J Faria; Mireille B Johnson; Cock van Oosterhout; Joanne Cable
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In silico evolution of gene cooption in pattern-forming gene networks.

Authors:  Alexander V Spirov; Marat A Sabirov; David M Holloway
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.