Literature DB >> 19102551

On the origin of the electrostatic potential difference at a liquid-vacuum interface.

Edward Harder1, Benoît Roux.   

Abstract

The microscopic origin of the interface potential calculated from computer simulations is elucidated by considering a simple model of molecules near an interface. The model posits that molecules are isotropically oriented and their charge density is Gaussian distributed. Molecules that have a charge density that is more negative toward their interior tend to give rise to a negative interface potential relative to the gaseous phase, while charge densities more positive toward their interior give rise to a positive interface potential. The interface potential for the model is compared to the interface potential computed from molecular dynamics simulations of the nonpolar vacuum-methane system and the polar vacuum-water interface system. The computed vacuum-methane interface potential from a molecular dynamics simulation (-220 mV) is captured with quantitative precision by the model. For the vacuum-water interface system, the model predicts a potential of -400 mV compared to -510 mV, calculated from a molecular dynamics simulation. The physical implications of this isotropic contribution to the interface potential is examined using the example of ion solvation in liquid methane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19102551      PMCID: PMC2671189          DOI: 10.1063/1.3027513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  22 in total

1.  Electrical properties of free surface of water and aqueous solutions.

Authors:  M Paluch
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 12.984

2.  Comment on "Study on the liquid-vapor interface of water. I. Simulation results of thermodynamic properties and orientational structure".

Authors:  M A Wilson; A Pohorille; L R Pratt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  1989-05-01       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Modulation of phospholipase A2 by electrostatic fields and dipole potential of glycosphingolipids in monolayers.

Authors:  B Maggio
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.922

4.  Size dependent ion hydration, its asymmetry, and convergence to macroscopic behavior.

Authors:  Sowmianarayanan Rajamani; Tuhin Ghosh; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Specific ion effects at the air/water interface.

Authors:  Pavel Jungwirth; Douglas J Tobias
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. I. The electrostatic potential in molecular liquids.

Authors:  M A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Are electrostatic potentials between regions of different chemical composition measurable? The Gibbs-Guggenheim Principle reconsidered, extended and its consequences revisited.

Authors:  Brian A Pethica
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 8.  Molecular structure and dynamics at liquid-liquid interfaces.

Authors:  I Benjamin
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.703

9.  Surface potential of the water liquid-vapor interface.

Authors:  M A Wilson; A Pohorille; L R Pratt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Altering the activity of syringomycin E via the membrane dipole potential.

Authors:  Olga S Ostroumova; Valery V Malev; Andrey N Bessonov; Jon Y Takemoto; Ludmila V Schagina
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.882

View more
  29 in total

1.  Assessing the accuracy of approximate treatments of ion hydration based on primitive quasichemical theory.

Authors:  Benoît Roux; Haibo Yu
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Polarizable Force Field for Molecular Ions Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Pedro E M Lopes; Edward Harder; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  On the fluctuations that drive small ions toward, and away from, interfaces between polar liquids and their vapors.

Authors:  Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke; Phillip L Geissler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ionic strength independence of charge distributions in solvation of biomolecules.

Authors:  J J Virtanen; T R Sosnick; K F Freed
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Effect of membrane tension on the electric field and dipole potential of lipid bilayer membrane.

Authors:  Dora Toledo Warshaviak; Michael J Muellner; Mirianas Chachisvilis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-06-22

Review 7.  Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G Thomas; Michael J Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  Affine-response model of molecular solvation of ions: Accurate predictions of asymmetric charging free energies.

Authors:  Jaydeep P Bardhan; Pavel Jungwirth; Lee Makowski
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Six-site polarizable model of water based on the classical Drude oscillator.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Pedro E M Lopes; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Communication: modeling charge-sign asymmetric solvation free energies with nonlinear boundary conditions.

Authors:  Jaydeep P Bardhan; Matthew G Knepley
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.