Literature DB >> 16597809

Effects of ageing on smell and taste.

J M Boyce1, G R Shone.   

Abstract

Disorders of taste and smell commonly present diagnostic dilemmas to the medical profession. This may be secondary to the lack of knowledge and understanding of these conditions. There seems to be a low level of interest in the disorders, when compared with disruption of the other senses such as sight and hearing. Nevertheless, impairment of these senses are common and may be life threatening, especially when they involve the elderly patient. The aetiology of the conditions is widespread, and extend beyond the content of this article. This article will relate only to how the ageing process may contribute to sensory dysfunction. It will focus on how the ageing process changes the normal anatomy and physiology of the senses, how this effects the person's quality of life, and the current management of these conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16597809      PMCID: PMC2579627          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.039453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  18 in total

Review 1.  Taste and smell perception affect appetite and immunity in the elderly.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B G Graham
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  FMRI brain activation in response to odors is reduced in primary olfactory areas of elderly subjects.

Authors:  Barbara Cerf-Ducastel; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Effect of taste and smell on secretion rate of salivary IgA in elderly and young persons.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; I D Miletic
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Age-related size reduction of foramina in the cribriform plate.

Authors:  J K Kalmey; J G Thewissen; D E Dluzen
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1998-07

5.  Aging effects on anatomy and neurophysiology of taste and smell.

Authors:  C M Mistretta
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability.

Authors:  T Miwa; M Furukawa; T Tsukatani; R M Costanzo; L J DiNardo; E R Reiter
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-05

8.  Olfactory function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: an investigation using psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques.

Authors:  Jürgen M Peters; Thomas Hummel; Tilman Kratzsch; Jörn Lötsch; Carsten Skarke; Lutz Frölich
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  A study on the frequency of olfactory dysfunction.

Authors:  B N Landis; C G Konnerth; T Hummel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Smell identification ability: changes with age.

Authors:  R L Doty; P Shaman; S L Applebaum; R Giberson; L Siksorski; L Rosenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  40 in total

1.  Characterization and Correction of Olfactory Deficits in Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Sagar U Nigwekar; Jeremy M Weiser; Sahir Kalim; Dihua Xu; Joshua L Wibecan; Sarah M Dougherty; Laurence Mercier-Lafond; Kristin M Corapi; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Eric H Holbrook; Dennis Brown; Ravi I Thadhani; Teodor G Păunescu
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Change in taste preference in undernourished elderly hospitalized subjects during periods of infection and convalescence.

Authors:  V Van Wymelbeke; T Jiang; P Pfitzenmeyer
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 3.  Changes of Olfactory Performance during the Process of Aging - Psychophysical Testing and Its Relevance in the Fight against Malnutrition.

Authors:  W Gunzer
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Taste disorders following cancer treatment: report of a case series.

Authors:  Joel B Epstein; Safira Marques de Andrade E Silva; Geena L Epstein; Jorge Henrique Santos Leal; Andrei Barasch; Gregory Smutzer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Smell and taste in palliative care: a systematic analysis of literature.

Authors:  Maria Heckel; Stephanie Stiel; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Neocortical Lewy bodies are associated with impaired odor identification in community-dwelling elders without clinical PD.

Authors:  Sukriti Nag; Lei Yu; Veronique G VanderHorst; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Robert S Wilson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Sensory Profile of Adults with Reduced Food Intake and the Potential Roles of Nutrition and Physical Activity Interventions.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Mathieu; Ryan E R Reid; Neil A King
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Impaired taste sensation in type 2 diabetic patients without chronic complications: a case-control study.

Authors:  L De Carli; R Gambino; C Lubrano; R Rosato; D Bongiovanni; F Lanfranco; F Broglio; E Ghigo; S Bo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  RNA profiles of rat olfactory epithelia: individual and age related variations.

Authors:  Maud Rimbault; Stéphanie Robin; Amaury Vaysse; Francis Galibert
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.