Literature DB >> 16585529

Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.

Astrid T Groot1, Joy L Horovitz, Jennifer Hamilton, Richard G Santangelo, Coby Schal, Fred Gould.   

Abstract

The chemical composition of the sexual communication signals of female moths is thought to be under strong stabilizing selection, because females that produce atypical pheromone blends suffer lower success in finding mates. This intraspecific selection pressure cannot explain the high diversity of moth pheromone blends found in nature. We conducted experiments to determine whether communication interference from males of closely related species could exert strong enough directional selection to cause evolution of these signals. Attraction and mating success of Heliothis subflexa (Hs) females with a normal quantitative trait locus for production of acetate pheromone components (norm-OAc) were compared with Hs females with an introgressed quantitative trait locus from Heliothis virescens (Hv) that dramatically decreased the amount of acetate esters in their pheromone glands (low-OAc). In field experiments with natural Hv and Hs populations, 10 times more Hv males were captured in traps baited with live low-OAc Hs females than in traps with norm-OAc Hs females. This pattern was confirmed in mate-choice assays in cages. Hybrids resulting from Hv-Hs matings have effectively zero fitness in the field. Combining our results with the extensive data set gathered in the past 40 years on the reproductive biology of Hv, we can quantitatively estimate that the directional selection exerted by Hv males on Hs females to produce relatively high amounts (>5%) of acetates can range from 0.135 to 0.231. Such intense interspecific selection may counteract intraspecific stabilizing selection that impedes evolutionary changes in pheromone blends and could lead to diversification of sexual signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16585529      PMCID: PMC1458663          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508609103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands.

Authors:  R S Vetter; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Introgressing pheromone QTL between species: towards an evolutionary understanding of differentiation in sexual communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Catherine Ward; Jing Wang; Amanda Pokrzywa; Jennifer O'Brien; Joy Bennett; Jennifer Kelly; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Identification of a sex pheromone ofHeliothis subflexa (GN.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and field trapping studies using different blends of components.

Authors:  P E Teal; R R Heath; J H Tumlinson; J R McLaughlin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individualHeliothis virescens females.

Authors:  M M Pope; L K Gaston; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  M A Noor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci.

Authors:  C T Ting; A Takahashi; C I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reproductive character displacement in Lymantria monacha from northern Japan?

Authors:  G Gries; P W Schaefer; R Gries; J Liska; T Gotoh
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; W Meyers; A P Crittenden; P Sniegowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Defining a synthetic pheromone blend attractive to male Heliothis subflexa under wind tunnel conditions.

Authors:  Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  28 in total

1.  Differential attraction of Heliothis subflexa males to synthetic pheromone lures in Eastern US and Western Mexico.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Richard G Santangelo; Emmarita Ricci; Cavell Brownie; Fred Gould; Coby Schal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Interspecific pheromone plume interference among sympatric heliothine moths: a wind tunnel test using live, calling females.

Authors:  Jonathan P Lelito; Andrew J Myrick; Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Age and mating status do not affect transcript levels of odorant receptor genes in male antennae of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa.

Authors:  Stephanie Soques; Gissella M Vásquez; Christina M Grozinger; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Functional consequences of sequence variation in the pheromone biosynthetic gene pgFAR for Ostrinia moths.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lassance; Marjorie A Liénard; Binu Antony; Shuguang Qian; Takeshi Fujii; Jun Tabata; Yukio Ishikawa; Christer Löfstedt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hairpencil volatiles influence interspecific courtship and mating between two related moth species.

Authors:  Neil Kirk Hillier; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Unusual macrocyclic lactone sex pheromone of Parcoblatta lata, a primary food source of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker.

Authors:  Dorit Eliyahu; Satoshi Nojima; Richard G Santangelo; Shannon Carpenter; Francis X Webster; David J Kiemle; Cesar Gemeno; Walter S Leal; Coby Schal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bidirectional selection for novel pheromone blend ratios in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.

Authors:  Jeremy D Allison; Ring T Cardé
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Genetic mapping of male pheromone response in the European corn borer identifies candidate genes regulating neurogenesis.

Authors:  Fotini A Koutroumpa; Astrid T Groot; Teun Dekker; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.

Authors:  Daniel J Hemmann; Jeremy D Allison; Kenneth F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Transcriptome analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Heiko Vogel; Andrew J Heidel; David G Heckel; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.