Literature DB >> 17999115

Bidirectional selection for novel pheromone blend ratios in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.

Jeremy D Allison1, Ring T Cardé.   

Abstract

The sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella, is a blend of (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E12-14:Ac, the major component capable of inducing attraction alone) and (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:Ac, the minor component, which is unattractive alone but augments attraction of the major component). In this study, the ratio of the two components responded to artificial directional selection in five of six selected lines, whereas no change was observed in the three control lines. The mean ratio (+/-SE) of Z9,E12-14:Ac to Z9-14:Ac went from 13.72 +/- 1.02:1 to 20.13 +/- 0.68:1 in high line 1, an increase of 47%. In the second high-selected line, the mean ratio (+/-SE) increased from 9.87 +/- 0.54:1 to 15.89 +/- 0.85:1, an increase of 61%. In low line 1, the mean ratio (+/-SE) in the parental generation was 10.74 +/- 0.78:1 and 7.35 +/- 0.41:1 in the last selected generation, a decrease of 32%. The response to selection was greater in low line 2, as the mean ratio (+/-SE) decreased from 10.11 +/- 0.66:1 to 5.65 +/- 0.55:1 in the last generation, a decrease of 44%. In low line 3, the mean ratio (+/-SE) in the parental generation was 13.63 +/- 0.82:1 and 6.47 +/- 0.26:1 in the last generation, a decrease of 53%. The response to selection was approximately symmetrical with a mean increase of 54% and a mean decrease of 43%. The increases in ratio observed in the high lines were caused by an increase in the titer of the Z9,E12-14:Ac component with no concurrent change in the titer of the component Z9-14:Ac. Among the low selected lines, the titers of both components increased; however, there was a greater relative increase in the titer of the component Z9-14:Ac. The absolute and relative titers of the sex pheromone components had decreased significantly in the F10 generation in some of the selected lines, five generations after the discontinuation of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999115     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9386-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

Review 1.  CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION AMONG ANIMALS.

Authors:  E O WILSON; W H BOSSERT
Journal:  Recent Prog Horm Res       Date:  1963

2.  Pheromone component patterns of moth evolution revealed by computer analysis of the Pherolist.

Authors:  John A Byer
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  The shape of female mating preferences.

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know?

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Chemical constraints on the evolution of olfactory communication channels of moths.

Authors:  John A Byers
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Diel periodicity and influence of age and mating on sex pheromone titer in gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar (L.).

Authors:  J D Tang; R E Charlton; R T Cardé; C M Yin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Internet programs for drawing moth pheromone analogs and searching literature database.

Authors:  John A Byers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions.

Authors:  A L Basolo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Trace chemicals: the essence of sexual communication systems in heliothis species.

Authors:  J A Klun; J R Plimmer; B A Bierl-Leonhardt; A N Sparks; O L Chapman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Sex stimulant and attractant in the Indian meal moth and in the almond moth.

Authors:  U E Brady; J H Tumlinson; R G Brownlee; R M Silverstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend: genetic basis and behavioural consequences.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Gerhard Schöfl; Ollie Inglis; Susanne Donnerhacke; Alice Classen; Antje Schmalz; Richard G Santangelo; Jennifer Emerson; Fred Gould; Coby Schal; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effect of Pheromone Blend Components, Sex Ratio, and Population Size on the Mating of Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Abeysinghe Mudiyanselage Prabodha Sammani; Dissanayaka Mudiyanselage Saman Kumara Dissanayaka; Leanage Kanaka Wolly Wijayaratne; William Robert Morrison
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.

Authors:  Daniel J Hemmann; Jeremy D Allison; Kenneth F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The response to selection for broad male response to female sex pheromone and its implications for divergence in close-range mating behavior in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  David C Droney; Callie J Musto; Katie Mancuso; Wendell L Roelofs; Charles E Linn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Rapid Divergence of Wing Volatile Profiles Between Subspecies of the Butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).

Authors:  Eden W McQueen; Nathan I Morehouse
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.