Literature DB >> 16583231

Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.

Zu-Lin Yu1, Qiang Qiu, Zhi-Min Xu, Jun-Xian Shen.   

Abstract

The piebald odorous frog (Odorrana schmackeri), the large odorous frog (Odorrana livida) and the concave-eared torrent frog (Amolops tormotus) are sympatric species living near the same torrent streams in the vicinity of Mt. Huangshan, China. A recent study demonstrated that A. tormotus can use sound signals involving ultrasonic components for communication in a noisy environment, and another sympatric species, O. livida, can also perceive ultrasonic sound. Here we report data on the hearing range of O. schmackeri by studying auditory evoked potentials and single-unit data from the torus semicircularis. This frog exhibits its two most sensitive peaks at 2 kHz and 3.5-4.0 kHz with thresholds <42 dB SPL, with an upper frequency limit of hearing at 8.5 kHz with threshold of 87 dB SPL. The upper limit is much lower than those of O. livida and A. tormotus, at 22 and 34 kHz, respectively. It suggests that sympatric species may respond differently to similar environmental selection pressures sculpting auditory communication systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583231     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-006-0125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  12 in total

1.  Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preferecnce in cricket frogs.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION IN INTRASPECIFIC DIVERGENCE OF MATE RECOGNITION SIGNALS IN THE CRICKET FROG, ACRIS CREPITANS.

Authors:  Michael J Ryan; Reginald B Cocroft; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; A S Rand; M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Auditory function, communication, and the brain-evoked response in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  J J Loftus-Hills; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Neurophysiological basis of directional hearing in amphibia.

Authors:  A Pettigrew; S H Chung; M Anson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03

7.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins; Chun-He Xu; Wen-Yu Lin; Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Nonoptimal propagation of advertisement calls of midwife toads in Iberian habitats.

Authors:  Mario Penna; Rafael Márquez; Jaime Bosch; Eduardo G Crespo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Katrin Voss; Ireen Köllmer; Dietmar Todt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Hair cells, hearing and hopping: a field guide to hair cell physiology in the frog.

Authors:  M S Smotherman; P M Narins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Whispering to the deaf: communication by a frog without external vocal sac or tympanum in noisy environments.

Authors:  Renaud Boistel; Thierry Aubin; Peter Cloetens; Max Langer; Brigitte Gillet; Patrice Josset; Nicolas Pollet; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.

Authors:  Wei-Rong Liu; Jun-Xian Shen; Yu-Jiao Zhang; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Mao-Qiang Xue
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Han Yang; Guang-Lei Hu; Shan Li; Zhi-Min Xu; Zhi Qi; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.836

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.