Literature DB >> 15735936

Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.

Lidia Eva Wysocki1, Friedrich Ladich.   

Abstract

Our current knowledge on sound detection in fishes is mainly based on data acquired under quiet laboratory conditions. However, it is important to relate auditory thresholds to background noise in order to determine the signal-detecting abilities of animals in the natural environment. We investigated the influence of two noise levels within the naturally occurring range on the auditory sensitivity of two hearing specialists (otophysines) and a hearing generalist. Audiograms of the goldfish Carassius auratus, the lined Raphael catfish Platydoras costatus and the pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus (hearing generalist) were determined between 200 and 4000 Hz (100-800 Hz for L. gibbosus) under laboratory conditions and under continuous white noise by recording auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Baseline thresholds showed greatest hearing sensitivity around 500 Hz in goldfish and catfish and at 100 Hz in the sunfish. Continuous white noise of 110 dB RMS elevated the thresholds by 15-20 dB in C. auratus and by 4-22 dB in P. costatus. White noise of 130 dB RMS elevated overall hearing thresholds significantly in the otophysines by 23-44 dB. In the goldfish, threshold did not shift at 4 kHz. In contrast, auditory thresholds in the sunfish declined only at the higher noise level by 7-11 dB. Our data show that the AEP recording technique is suitable for studying masking in fishes, and that the occurrence and degree of the threshold shift (masking) depend on the hearing sensitivity of fishes, the frequency, and noise levels tested. The results indicate that acoustic communication and orientation of fishes, in particular of hearing specialists, are limited by noise regimes in their environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15735936      PMCID: PMC2504637          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4043-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  20 in total

1.  Did auditory sensitivity and vocalization evolve independently in otophysan fishes?

Authors:  F Ladich
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 2.  Why pinnipeds don't echolocate.

Authors:  R J Schusterman; D Kastak; D H Levenson; C J Reichmuth; B L Southall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Sound detection and processing by fish: critical review and major research questions.

Authors:  A N Popper; R R Fay
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Neural mechanisms in sound detection and temporal summation.

Authors:  R R Fay; S Coombs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach.

Authors:  T N Kenyon; F Ladich; H Y Yan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The representation of conspecific sounds in the auditory brainstem of teleost fishes.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Masking of tones by noise for the goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-10

8.  Auditory masking patterns in the goldfish (Carassius auratus): psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  R R Fay; W A Ahroon; A A Orawski
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Non-simultaneous auditory masking in the goldfish, Carassius auratus.

Authors:  A N Popper; N L Clarke
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Acoustic stimulation of the ear of the goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay; A N Popper
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  15 in total

1.  Year-round variability of ambient noise in temperate freshwater habitats and its implications for fishes.

Authors:  Sonja Amoser; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Gerald Radspieler; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Auditory response characteristics of the piebald odorous frog and their implications.

Authors:  Zu-Lin Yu; Qiang Qiu; Zhi-Min Xu; Jun-Xian Shen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ontogenetic development of auditory sensitivity and sound production in the squeaker catfish Synodontis schoutedeni.

Authors:  Walter Lechner; Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Otolith morphology and hearing abilities in cave- and surface-dwelling ecotypes of the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (Teleostei: Poeciliidae).

Authors:  Tanja Schulz-Mirbach; Friedrich Ladich; Rüdiger Riesch; Martin Plath
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The effect of biological and anthropogenic sound on the auditory sensitivity of oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  Loranzie S Rogers; Rosalyn L Putland; Allen F Mensinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Ontogenetic development of weberian ossicles and hearing abilities in the African bullhead catfish.

Authors:  Walter Lechner; Egon Heiss; Thomas Schwaha; Martin Glösmann; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hearing in cichlid fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Tanja Schulz-Mirbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between swim bladder morphology and hearing abilities--a case study on Asian and African cichlids.

Authors:  Tanja Schulz-Mirbach; Brian Metscher; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.