OBJECTIVE: Cardiac output (CO) has traditionally been measured using invasive techniques, which involve an element of risk. Thus, a reliable less-invasive method for determining CO would be very valuable for research use. We tested whether simple analysis of the arterial pulse waveform, not requiring large-vessel catheterisation or expensive equipment, could provide an estimate of CO that is accurate enough for pharmacological studies. METHODS: We measured CO in 11 healthy male subjects who received low and high doses of dexmedetomidine (alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist), using pulse contour analysis, echocardiography and pulmonary thermodilution techniques. RESULTS: At baseline, these methods gave the following mean (SD) values of CO: 6.18 (1.59), 5.22 (1.35) and 7.03 (1.54) l/min, respectively. High-dose dexmedetomidine reduced CO to 4.50 (0.68), 3.65 (0.65) and 4.80 (0.89) l/min, corresponding to -25 (14) %, -28 (12) % and -30 (14) % reductions from baseline, respectively. The pulse contour method described these dexmedetomidine-induced changes in CO very similarly to the thermodilution and echocardiographic methods. The limits of agreement [bias (2SD)] were 0.55 (2.55) and -0.10 (2.04) l/min, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive pulse contour analysis technique might be suitable for pharmacological studies for the detection of major drug-induced reductions in CO.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac output (CO) has traditionally been measured using invasive techniques, which involve an element of risk. Thus, a reliable less-invasive method for determining CO would be very valuable for research use. We tested whether simple analysis of the arterial pulse waveform, not requiring large-vessel catheterisation or expensive equipment, could provide an estimate of CO that is accurate enough for pharmacological studies. METHODS: We measured CO in 11 healthy male subjects who received low and high doses of dexmedetomidine (alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist), using pulse contour analysis, echocardiography and pulmonary thermodilution techniques. RESULTS: At baseline, these methods gave the following mean (SD) values of CO: 6.18 (1.59), 5.22 (1.35) and 7.03 (1.54) l/min, respectively. High-dose dexmedetomidine reduced CO to 4.50 (0.68), 3.65 (0.65) and 4.80 (0.89) l/min, corresponding to -25 (14) %, -28 (12) % and -30 (14) % reductions from baseline, respectively. The pulse contour method described these dexmedetomidine-induced changes in CO very similarly to the thermodilution and echocardiographic methods. The limits of agreement [bias (2SD)] were 0.55 (2.55) and -0.10 (2.04) l/min, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive pulse contour analysis technique might be suitable for pharmacological studies for the detection of major drug-induced reductions in CO.
Authors: Giorgio Della Rocca; Maria Gabriella Costa; Cecilia Coccia; Livia Pompei; Pierangelo Di Marco; Vincenzo Vilardi; Paolo Pietropaoli Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2003 Aug-Sep Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Berthold Bein; Frank Worthmann; Peter H Tonner; Andrea Paris; Markus Steinfath; Jürgen Hedderich; Jens Scholz Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Juha W Koskenvuo; Rachel Mirsky; Yan Zhang; Franca S Angeli; Sarah Jahn; Tero-Pekka Alastalo; Nelson B Schiller; Andrew J Boyle; Kanu Chatterjee; Teresa De Marco; Yerem Yeghiazarians Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michael Sander; Claudia D Spies; Herko Grubitzsch; Achim Foer; Marcus Müller; Christian von Heymann Journal: Crit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 9.097