Literature DB >> 33922880

The Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management According to Stroke Volume Variation on Postoperative Bowel Function Recovery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Ki-Young Lee1, Young-Chul Yoo1, Jin-Sun Cho1, Wootaek Lee1,2, Ji-Young Kim1,2, Myoung-Hwa Kim1,2.   

Abstract

Stroke volume variation (SVV) has been used to predict fluid responsiveness; however, it remains unclear whether goal-directed fluid therapy using SVV contributes to bowel function recovery in abdominal surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare bowel movement recovery in patients undergoing colon resection surgery between groups using traditional or SVV-based methods for intravenous fluid management. We collected data between March 2015 and July 2017. Bowel function recovery was analyzed based on the gas-passing time, sips of water time, and soft diet (SD) time. Finally, we analyzed data from 60 patients. There was no significant between-group difference in the patients' characteristics. Compared with the control group (n = 30), the SVV group (n = 30) had a significantly higher colloid volume and lower crystalloid volume. Moreover, the gas-passing time (77.8 vs. 85.3 h, p = 0.034) and SD time (67.6 vs. 85.1 h, p < 0.001) were significantly faster in the SVV group than in the control group. Compared with the control group, the SVV group showed significantly lower scores of pain on a numeric rating scale and morphine equivalent doses during post-anesthetic care, at 24 postoperative hours, and at 48 postoperative hours. Our findings suggested that, compared with the control group, the SVV group showed a faster postoperative SD time, reduced acute postoperative pain intensity, and lower rescue analgesics. Therefore, SVV-based optimal fluid management is expected to potentially contribute to postoperative bowel function recovery in patients undergoing colon resection surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bowel movement; colon cancer surgery; goal-directed fluid therapy; recovery; stroke volume variation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922880     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  30 in total

Review 1.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthias S Goepfert; Hans Peter Richter; Christine Zu Eulenburg; Janna Gruetzmacher; Erik Rafflenbeul; Katharina Roeher; Alexandra von Sandersleben; Stefan Diedrichs; Herrmann Reichenspurner; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care?

Authors:  Timothy E Miller; Anthony M Roche; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system.

Authors:  Helen Ingrid Opdam; Li Wan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Crystalloid versus Colloid for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Using a Closed-loop System: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Trial in Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Amelie Delaporte; Brigitte Ickx; Karim Touihri; Ida Stany; Luc Barvais; Luc Van Obbergh; Patricia Loi; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson; Philippe Van der Linden
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 7.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Gunther Pestel; Cameron Ricks; Andreas Hoeft; Azriel Perel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Diminished adrenal sensitivity to endogenous and exogenous adrenocorticotropic hormone in critical illness: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Margriet F C de Jong; Nienke Molenaar; Albertus Beishuizen; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Anesthesia and perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients - specific issues (part 2).

Authors:  Santosh Patel; Jan M Lutz; Umakanth Panchagnula; Sujesh Bansal
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.