Literature DB >> 12944446

Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Giorgio Della Rocca1, Maria Gabriella Costa, Cecilia Coccia, Livia Pompei, Pierangelo Di Marco, Vincenzo Vilardi, Paolo Pietropaoli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The PiCCO System is a relatively new device allowing intermittent cardiac output monitoring by aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique (Aorta intermittent) and continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis (Aorta continuous). The objective of this study was to assess the level of agreement of Aorta intermittent and Aorta continuous with intermittent (PA intermittent) and continuous cardiac output (PA continuous) measured through a special pulmonary artery catheter (Vigilance System SvO(2)/CCO Monitor) in patients undergoing single- or double-lung transplantation.
METHODS: Measurements were obtained in 58 patients: at four time points in patients undergoing single-lung transplantation and at six time points in those undergoing double-lung transplantation. Bland and Altman and correlation analyses were used for statistical evaluation.
RESULTS: We found close agreement between the techniques. Mean bias between Aorta intermittent and PA intermittent and between Aorta continuous and PA continuous was 0.18 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.59 L x min(-1)) and -0.07 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.46 L x min(-1)) respectively. Mean bias between PA continuous and PA intermittent and Aorta continuous and PA intermittent was 0.15 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.39 L x min(-1)) and 0.08 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.43 L x min(-1)).
CONCLUSION: Measurements with the aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique give continuous and intermittent values that agree with the pulmonary thermodilution method which is still the current clinical standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12944446     DOI: 10.1007/bf03018714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Chang-Hoon Koo; Tae Kyong Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of an advanced minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring with a continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring during lung transplantation.

Authors:  Roland Tomasi; Stephan Prueckner; Stephan Czerner; Renè Schramm; Gerhard Preissler; Bernhard Zwißler; Vera von Dossow-Hanfstingl
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  [Measurement of cardiac output].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Estimation of cardiac output in a pharmacological trial using a simple method based on arterial blood pressure signal waveform: a comparison with pulmonary thermodilution and echocardiographic methods.

Authors:  Jani Penttilä; Amir Snapir; Erkki Kentala; Juha Koskenvuo; Jussi Posti; Mika Scheinin; Harry Scheinin; Tom Kuusela
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Gino Zadeii; Samuel Congello; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Effects of volumetric vs. pressure-guided fluid therapy on postoperative inflammatory response: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tamas Szakmany; Ildiko Toth; Zsolt Kovacs; Tamas Leiner; Andras Mikor; Tamas Koszegi; Zsolt Molnar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Role of PiCCO monitoring for the integrated management of neurogenic pulmonary edema following traumatic brain injury: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoping Lin; Zhijun Xu; Pengfei Wang; Yan Xu; Gensheng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.