Literature DB >> 16538377

Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

B Suresh Krishna1, Sara C Steenrod, James W Bisley, Yevgeniy B Sirotin, Michael E Goldberg.   

Abstract

Monkeys demonstrate improved contrast sensitivity at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade (Science 299:81-86, 2003). Such perceptual improvements have been ascribed to an endogenous attentional advantage induced by the saccade plan. Speeded reaction times have also been used as evidence for attention. We therefore asked whether the attentional advantage at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade led to speeded manual reaction times following probes presented at the saccade goal in a simple detection task. We found that monkeys showed slower manual reaction times when the probe appeared at the memorized goal of the planned saccade when compared to manual reaction times following a probe that appeared opposite the saccade goal. Flashing a distractor at the saccade goal after target presentation appeared to slow reaction times further. Our data, combined with prior results, suggest that a spatially localized inhibition operates on the neural representation of the saccade goal. This inhibition may be closely related or identical to the processes underlying inhibition-of-return. We also found that if the same detection task was interleaved with a difficult perceptual discrimination task, manual reaction times became faster when the probe was at the saccade goal. We interpret these results as being an effect of task difficulty; the more difficult interleaved task may have engaged endogenous attentional resources more effectively, allowing it to override the inhibition at the saccade goal. We construct and discuss a simple working hypothesis for the relationship between the effects of prior attention on neural activity in salience maps and on performance in detection and discrimination tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16538377     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0370-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

3.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Alla Ignashchenkova; Peter W Dicke; Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Andrew H Bell; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Covert orienting of attention in macaques. II. Contributions of parietal cortex.

Authors:  D L Robinson; E M Bowman; C Kertzman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Neurophysiological evidence for a role of posterior parietal cortex in redirecting visual attention.

Authors:  M A Steinmetz; C Constantinidis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stress and alcohol cues exert conjoint effects on go and stop signal responding in male problem drinkers.

Authors:  Martin Zack; Tracy M Woodford; Anne M Tremblay; Lindsay Steinberg; Laurie A Zawertailo; Usoa E Busto
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Rhesus monkeys mislocalize saccade targets flashed for 100ms around the time of a saccade.

Authors:  S Morgan Jeffries; Makoto Kusunoki; James W Bisley; Ian S Cohen; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality.

Authors:  H R Heekeren; S Marrett; D A Ruff; P A Bandettini; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.