Literature DB >> 15115792

Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention.

Jillian H Fecteau1, Andrew H Bell, Douglas P Munoz.   

Abstract

How do stimuli in the environment interact with the goals of observers? We addressed this question by showing that the relevance of an abruptly appearing visual object (cue) changes how observers orient attention toward a subsequent object (target) and how this target is represented in the activity of neurons in the superior colliculus. Initially after the appearance of the cue, attention is driven to its locus. This capture of attention is followed by a second bias in orienting attention, where observers preferentially orient to new locations in the visual scene-an effect called inhibition of return. In the superior colliculus, these two automatic biases in orienting attention were associated with changes in neural activity linked to the appearance of the target-relatively stronger activity linked to the capture of attention and weaker activity linked to inhibition of return. This behavioral pattern changes when the cue predicts the upcoming location of the target-the benefit associated with the capture of attention is enhanced and inhibition of return is reduced. These goal-driven changes in behavior were associated with an increase in pretarget- and target-related activity. Taken together, the goals of observers modify stimulus-driven changes in neural activity with both signals represented in the salience maps of the superior colliculi.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15115792     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00184.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Computational modeling of collicular integration of perceptual responses and attention in microsaccades.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

5.  Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  David R Evens; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Race and gender of faces can be ignored.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Liana Machado; Benjamin Knight
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-15

7.  Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes.

Authors:  James R Müller; Marios G Philiastides; William T Newsome
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Sara C Steenrod; James W Bisley; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Competitive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming.

Authors:  Michael C Dorris; Etienne Olivier; Doug P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Endogenous attention signals evoked by threshold contrast detection in human superior colliculus.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; David Ress
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.