Literature DB >> 16537097

European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries.

Joachim Cohen1, Isabelle Marcoux, Johan Bilsen, Patrick Deboosere, Gerrit van der Wal, Luc Deliens.   

Abstract

In many European countries, the last decade has been marked by an increasing debate about the acceptability and regulation of euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in medical practice. Growing public sensibility to a 'right to die' for terminally ill patients has been one of the main constituents of these debates. Within this context, we sought to describe and compare acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 33 European countries. We used the European Values Study data of 1999-2000 with a total of 41125 respondents (63% response rate) in 33 European countries. The main outcome measure concerned the acceptance of euthanasia (defined as 'terminating the life of the incurably sick', rated on a scale from 1 to 10). Results showed that the acceptance of euthanasia tended to be high in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands, Denmark, France, Sweden), while a markedly low acceptance was found in others (e.g. Romania, Malta and Turkey). A multivariate ordinal regression showed that weaker religious belief was the most important factor associated with a higher acceptance; however, there were also socio-demographic differences: younger cohorts, people from non-manual social classes, and people with a higher educational level tended to have a higher acceptance of euthanasia. While religious belief, socio-demographic factors, and also moral values (i.e. the belief in the right to self-determination) could largely explain the differences between countries, our findings suggest that perceptions regarding euthanasia are probably also influenced by national traditions and history (e.g. Germany). Thus, we demonstrated clear cross-national differences with regard to the acceptance of euthanasia, which can serve as an important basis for further debate and research in the specific countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537097     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  31 in total

1.  Attitudes toward active euthanasia among medical students at two German universities.

Authors:  Katri Elina Clemens; Eva Klein; Birgit Jaspers; Eberhard Klaschik
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Advance directives in english and French law: different concepts, different values, different societies.

Authors:  Ruth Judith Horn
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2014-03

3.  [Tuition in palliative medicine. Does it have an impact on future physicians' attitudes toward active euthanasia?].

Authors:  K E Clemens; B Jaspers; E Klein; E Klaschik
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries.

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Paul Van Landeghem; Nico Carpentier; Luc Deliens
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Written institutional ethics policies on euthanasia: an empirical-based organizational-ethical framework.

Authors:  Joke Lemiengre; Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé; Paul Schotsmans; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-05

6.  Passive Suicide Ideation Among Older Adults in Europe: A Multilevel Regression Analysis of Individual and Societal Determinants in 12 Countries (SHARE).

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Beat Fux; Hannes Mayerl; Éva Rásky; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  Between quality of life and hope. Attitudes and beliefs of Muslim women toward withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  Chaïma Ahaddour; Stef Van den Branden; Bert Broeckaert
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-09

8.  Perspectives on care and communication involving incurably ill Turkish and Moroccan patients, relatives and professionals: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Fuusje M de Graaff; Patriek Mistiaen; Walter Ljm Devillé; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Concerns about end-of-life care and support for euthanasia.

Authors:  Jane L Givens; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Preference for Palliative Care in Cancer Patients: Are Men and Women Alike?

Authors:  Fahad Saeed; Michael Hoerger; Sally A Norton; Elizabeth Guancial; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.